Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Marking case as closed
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SPI case status|checked}}
{{SPI case status|close}}


<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>
<noinclude>__TOC__</noinclude>

Revision as of 01:07, 29 February 2012

– This SPI case is closed and will be archived shortly by an SPI clerk or checkuser.

MariaJaydHicky

MariaJaydHicky (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

Older archives were moved to an archive of the archive because of the page size and are listed below:

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHicky/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/MariaJaydHicky.


06 February 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

Similar to lattest reports (KenzieWilliamsPrice (talk · contribs) and TheRealTings (talk · contribs)), undoing my edits (this time at Do It Our Way (Play)). Genre-warring. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:10, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Tagged, blocked, reverted.—Kww(talk) 19:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

MoMoneyMoProblem (talk · contribs) as well. TNXMan 19:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Blocked and tagged. No edits to revert.—Kww(talk) 19:31, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]