Talk:Amotion: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:21, 8 March 2012

Albums Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Background

If we're going to be writing bckgr, might as well just spell out background. Reb42 17:00, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Move?

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not done. Skomorokh 10:42, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AMotion → Amotion —

Move to "Amotion" (without the capital "M") per WP:CAPS. -- GunMetal Angel 21:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support Support as per WP:MOSTM. --Labattblueboy (talk) 21:44, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - given that this is the way it is spelt in the article... --Jubilee♫clipman 19:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. See iPod, iTunes, iBook, iMac, eMac, etc. WP:CAPS/WP:MOSTM are targeted at things like aMOTION, which would be wrong. — The Man in Question (in question) 21:04, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Should be at aMOTION. ¦ Reisio (talk) 01:58, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Comment

Technically, this article is now called aMotion rather than AMotion. Is this acceptable? Furthermore, the article lead has been change to reflect this change. In fact, the album name is written as aMOTION on the cover. So now I am totally confused! Worse still, the info box still has it as Amotion... Oh and: their previous album is under Emotive (album) rather than eMotive (album) (despite the fact that the album cover styles it eMOTIVe). Any thoughts? --Jubilee♫clipman 04:43, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

aMOTION and eMOTIVe ¦ Reisio (talk) 08:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I don't see what's so confusing about it. It's written aMotion on the album cover so thats clearly how the band intended it to be written. Just because it's not standard doesn't mean it's wrong, otherwise Limp Bizkit would be moved to Limp Biscuit. The article name has to have the first letter capitalised because that's how the software is built (would be awesome if that could be changed) but other than that it should be aMotion. Danikat (talk) 11:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 09:23, 8 July 2011 edit Paine Ellsworth (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 255,943 edits m add DISPLAYTITLE ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:21, 8 March 2012 edit undo Danikat (talk \| contribs) 303 edits →Comment Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:

	:[[aMOTION]] and [[eMOTIVe]] ¦ [[User:Reisio\|Reisio]] ([[User talk:Reisio\|talk]]) 08:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)		:[[aMOTION]] and [[eMOTIVe]] ¦ [[User:Reisio\|Reisio]] ([[User talk:Reisio\|talk]]) 08:16, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
			:: Personally I don't see what's so confusing about it. It's written aMotion on the album cover so thats clearly how the band intended it to be written. Just because it's not standard doesn't mean it's wrong, otherwise [[Limp Bizkit]] would be moved to Limp Biscuit. The article name has to have the first letter capitalised because that's how the software is built (would be awesome if that could be changed) but other than that it should be aMotion. [[User:Danikat\|Danikat]] ([[User talk:Danikat\|talk]]) 11:21, 8 March 2012 (UTC)