Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleap: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →[[Eleap]]: fixed redlink |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:*'''Comment''' Didn't realise it was also only in beta. Another reason to delete it. ➨ [[User_talk:Redvers|❝]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|R]]</font><font color="green">[[User:Redvers/Esperanza|E]]</font><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|DVERS]]</font></b>[[Special:Contributions/Redvers|❞]] 21:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC) |
:*'''Comment''' Didn't realise it was also only in beta. Another reason to delete it. ➨ [[User_talk:Redvers|❝]]<b><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|R]]</font><font color="green">[[User:Redvers/Esperanza|E]]</font><font color="red">[[User:Redvers|DVERS]]</font></b>[[Special:Contributions/Redvers|❞]] 21:42, 11 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''', ''unless'' it can be proved through the use of [[WP:V|verifiable]] information taken from [[WP:RS|reliable, third-party sources]] that this web-based training program meets the criteria displayed at the [[Wikipedia:Notability (websites)]] guideline. The current-proposed criteria at the [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] guideline proposal may also apply. If deleted, this AfD discussion should not prevent thr re-creation of this article at a later date, provided that the above criteria can be demonstratably met. -- [[User:Saberwyn|Saberwyn]] 13:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''', ''unless'' it can be proved through the use of [[WP:V|verifiable]] information taken from [[WP:RS|reliable, third-party sources]] that this web-based training program meets the criteria displayed at the [[Wikipedia:Notability (websites)]] guideline. The current-proposed criteria at the [[Wikipedia:Notability (software)]] guideline proposal may also apply. If deleted, this AfD discussion should not prevent thr re-creation of this article at a later date, provided that the above criteria can be demonstratably met. -- [[User:Saberwyn|Saberwyn]] 13:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC) |
||
*'''eLeaP reviewed''', I will encourage readers to follow Saul Weiner's review of the eLeaP platform. |
|||
Revision as of 20:08, 12 April 2006
Non-notable training program. Was PRODded, but tag removed after article edited to remove advertising. Notability not established or asserted. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 21:26, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Seems to me, beta services should be given the opportunity to rise or fall. Kinda "eating their young" mentality going on? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 216.84.42.234 (talk • contribs) .
- Delete, unless it can be proved through the use of verifiable information taken from reliable, third-party sources that this web-based training program meets the criteria displayed at the Wikipedia:Notability (websites) guideline. The current-proposed criteria at the Wikipedia:Notability (software) guideline proposal may also apply. If deleted, this AfD discussion should not prevent thr re-creation of this article at a later date, provided that the above criteria can be demonstratably met. -- Saberwyn 13:26, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- eLeaP reviewed, I will encourage readers to follow Saul Weiner's review of the eLeaP platform.