Talk:Goal orientation: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:41, 22 March 2012

Per Wikipedia:Citing sources, most articles use footnote citations, aka WP:CITEFOOT, it's ok to use a parenthetical referencing style, but it is a bit odd. We don't do both. Toddst1 (talk) 02:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:40, 22 March 2012 edit Toddst1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,705 edits →Citation style: new section		Revision as of 02:41, 22 March 2012 edit undo Toddst1 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors 137,705 edits →Citation style: a parenthetical referencing style Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Citation style ==		== Citation style ==

	Per [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], most articles use footnote citations, aka [[WP:CITEFOOT]], it's ok to use a parenthetical referencing style, but ''it is a bit odd.'' We don't do both. [[User:Toddst1\|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1\|talk]])</small> 02:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)		Per [[Wikipedia:Citing sources]], most articles use footnote citations, aka [[WP:CITEFOOT]], it's ok to use [[WP:HARV\|a parenthetical referencing style]], but ''it is a bit odd.'' We don't do both. [[User:Toddst1\|Toddst1]] <small>([[User talk: Toddst1\|talk]])</small> 02:40, 22 March 2012 (UTC)