Jump to content

Equivalence of metrics: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Taxipom (talk | contribs)
Topological equivalence: moved last condition to sufficient. It is obviously not necessary.
Line 12: Line 12:


The following are sufficient but not necessary conditions for topological equivalence:
The following are sufficient but not necessary conditions for topological equivalence:
* there exists a strictly increasing, continuous, and [[subadditive]] <math>f:R_{+} \to R</math> such that <math>d_{2} = f \circ d_{1}</math>.<ref>Ok, p. 127, footnote 12.</ref>
* there exists a strictly increasing, continuous, and [[subadditive]] <math>f:\mathbb{R}_{+} \to \mathbb{R}</math> such that <math>d_{2} = f \circ d_{1}</math>.<ref>Ok, p. 127, footnote 12.</ref>
* for each <math>x \in X</math>, there exist positive constants <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> such that, for every point <math>y \in X</math>,
* for each <math>x \in X</math>, there exist positive constants <math>\alpha</math> and <math>\beta</math> such that, for every point <math>y \in X</math>,
:<math>\alpha d_{1} (x, y) \leq d_{2} (x, y) \leq \beta d_{1} (x, y).</math>
:<math>\alpha d_{1} (x, y) \leq d_{2} (x, y) \leq \beta d_{1} (x, y).</math>

Revision as of 21:28, 7 April 2012

In the study of metric spaces in mathematics, there are various notions of two metrics on the same underlying space being "the same", or equivalent.

In the following, will denote a non-empty set and and will denote two metrics on .

Topological equivalence

The two metrics and are said to be topologically equivalent if they generate the same topology on . The adjective "topological" is often dropped.[1] There are multiple ways of expressing this condition:

  • a subset is -open if and only if it is -open;
  • the open balls "nest": for any point and any radius , there exist radii such that
and
  • the identity function is both -continuous and -continuous.

The following are sufficient but not necessary conditions for topological equivalence:

  • there exists a strictly increasing, continuous, and subadditive such that .[2]
  • for each , there exist positive constants and such that, for every point ,

Strong equivalence

Two metrics and are strongly equivalent if and only if there exist positive constants and such that, for every ,

In contrast to the sufficient condition for topological equivalence listed above, strong equivalence requires that there is a single set of constants that holds for every pair of points in , rather than potentially different constants associated with each point of .

Strong equivalence of two metrics implies topological equivalence, but not vice versa. An intuitive reason why topological equivalence does not imply strong equivalence is that bounded sets under one metric are also bounded under a strongly equivalent metric, but not necessarily under a topologically equivalent metric.

All metrics induced by the p-norm, including the euclidean metric, the taxicab metric, and the Chebyshev distance, are strongly equivalent.[3]

Even if two metrics are strongly equivalent, not all properties of the respective metric spaces are preserved. For instance, a function from the space to itself might be a contraction mapping under one metric, but not necessarily under a strongly equivalent one.[4]

Properties preserved by equivalence

  • The continuity of a function is preserved is either the domain or range is remetrized by an equivalent metric, but uniform continuity is preserved by strongly equivalent metrics.[5]
  • The differentiability of a function is preserved if either the domain or range is remetrized by a strongly equivalent metric.[6]

Notes

  1. ^ Bishop and Goldberg, p. 10.
  2. ^ Ok, p. 127, footnote 12.
  3. ^ Ok, p. 138.
  4. ^ Ok, p. 175.
  5. ^ Ok, p. 209.
  6. ^ Cartan, p. 27.

References

  • Tensor analysis on manifolds. Dover Publications. 1980. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  • Efe Ok (2007). Real analysis with economics applications. Princeton University Press. ISBN 0-691-11768-3.
  • Henri Cartan (1971). Differential Calculus. Kershaw Publishing Company LTD. ISBN 0-395-12033-0.