Jump to content

Talk:Super Smash Bros. Brawl/Archive 4: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Pointless Info
Line 84: Line 84:


This is being moved to my talk page. [[User_Talk:Sherwharr|H-Bomb-Talk Page]] 23:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
This is being moved to my talk page. [[User_Talk:Sherwharr|H-Bomb-Talk Page]] 23:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

== Pointless Info ==

This is a encyclopedia people . Just the facts! It dosen't require Character Speculations. (That's for the Talk Page. Go to bottom of page for it.) So i'm removing the thing about Toad and Wario. [[User:70.118.94.204|70.118.94.204]] 00:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:03, 17 April 2006

WikiProject iconVideo games Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
???This page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Hmm... I don't mean to be a spoilsport for Jacob .C, but there is absolutely nothing confirmed about this game, only that it is on the Revolution and will have some level of online support. No characters have ever been mentioned. For all we know, Nintendo might decide to create a new, original cast for the game, forgetting about everyone else. (I'm ignoring the fact that the article is riddled with typos and formatting errors, but that can be easily fixed and is not the point of my criticism.) I recommend we revert this to the redirect, but I'm not going to do it unless someone else agrees (I don't want an edit war on my hands). --ZeromaruTC 18:52, 9 October 2005 (UTC)

The article is now in "decent" shape. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 04:29, 10 October 2005 (UTC)

Sonic & Tails

I can guarantee you all right now that Sonic and Tails WILL NOT be in the next Smash Bros. game. They are owned by Sega. Nintendo only includes characters owned by themselves: no royalties were ever paid to other companies. Now stop adding them as "strong contenders". --ZeromaruTC 03:19, 18 October 2005 (UTC)

Ok I Will Stop Putting Them As "Strong Contender" But You Must First Stop Putting Koopa Troopa And Ridley Down As "Strong Contenders". Thank You For Your Cooperation.

                                                207.200.116.6 21:46, 19 October 2005 (UTC)William Burch

I never did in the first place, but I think that both Ridley and Koopa Troopa WERE in the Nintendo Power poll, whereas Sonic and Tails were not. Indeed, even if they weren't (Ridley, Koopa Troopa) in the poll, Nintendo can still use them and they are popular choices among fan communities, so I have no objection to their mention. I will not personally re-add them, though. --ZeromaruTC 22:43, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank You, And Do You Have Any Clue Who Wrote All Those Other Charcters, I Highly Doubt There Were In The Poll. I Will Not Take The Info Away However(It Was 50% Good And 50% Bad) Untill Someone Agrees With Me.

                                                     207.200.116.6Willaim Burch

STOP ADDING CHARACTERS

There are NO, I repeat, ABSOLUTELY NO characters (or anything like date, developer, ratings, and the like) confirmed for this game. The ONLY reason Wario and Toad are even mentioned is because Peach and Bowser got in Melee after the same poll. I'm going to request this page be locked from editing until Nintedo starts announcing information, 'cause all these speculative edits is just flat-out insulting. --ZeromaruTC 15:31, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Do U Know Who Wrote All That "Monkey" Stuff This Morning (October 22 2005) and tottally ruined this page. That Is Such A Big Shame for Whoever Wrote All That Junk.

                                                       ---- William Burch
It was, like yourself, an anonymous user. If you're going to be making worthwhile edits, I recommend signing up with your own username. Anonymous users, though more than welcome here, are usually taken with a grain of salt when they disagree with existing users. There are also a host of other benefits. --ZeromaruTC 00:21, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Nov 12 2005 Press Release?

Can I get a source for that press release? I removed the character list added ('cause it was still speculative), but I kept the note about Satoru Iwata's press release, assuming it actually happened. I can't find any reference to it, though. --ZeromaruTC 11:30, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

No Confirmation

I haven't seen anything to support this person's statements either. I'm not going to erase it until I can get definite proof that he's lying, though. --Shadow Wyvern 23:13, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

There has been nothing about it on google, any mainstream gaming news site, or even Nintendo.com. The only event during this time was an after TGS event, where developers showed off their games. Nintendo themselves had a couple of games there, Mario Party 7 being the main one. No conferences what so ever. This is a blatent lie. 65.33.242.23 05:59, 15 November 2005 (UTC)Legoman727

ESRB Rating

Well, this game will be surely rated M for Mature, because this one may contain some worse content that did not happen in Super Smash Bros. or Super Smash Bros. Melee. --ZachKudrna18@yahoo.com

The game isn't rated, I've removed the rating info. --Zeromaru[[User_talk:Zeromaru|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Zeromaru|<sup>C</sup>]] 08:21, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
Plus, Nintendo wouldn't make a SSB game that didn't appeal to younger audiences, and SSBM was only rated T because E 10+ hadn't been invented yet. --Ac1983fan
No way would Nintendo be Mature most of thier audience for that game is teens and older children. If they rated it Mature they would have virtually lost half thier audience. 70.118.94.204 13:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Call me a pedantic little git if you like, but does anyone really think that link to the "Fan Created Character Database" - a fan site that's choc-a-bloc with characters who, frankly, are merely characters SOME fans would LIKE to see in the game- is worthy of inclusion? The number of characters on the page is ridiculous. I assume Revolution (the machine) will be powerful, but the page is simple asinine. Plus some of the characters are trivial and pointless. For example, how is "Vacuum Luigi" not just Luigi with the Poltergust 3000? Most of the characters are all-but-unknown and Jessie and James from Team Rocket are listed, despite being mainly animé characters (I'm aware they have appeared in 2 games, but I think it's a given they won't be playable characters in SSBR). Wikipedia doesn't link to fan fiction (or shouldn't, at any rate), so why should it link to this site? Bear in mind, once the game is released, the site will HAVE to be removed from these listings for gross inaccuracy unless it vastly alters. Do we really have to delay the deletion by a year? --L T Dangerous 22:16, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Funny, I never saw it before. Replaced with Gamespot link. --Zeromaru[[User_talk:Zeromaru|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Zeromaru|<sup>C</sup>]] 23:53, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Removed stub notice

This may be a REALLY short article, but it contains every iota of information on the game outside Nintendo HQ. I've removed the stub notice, since there's nothing to expand on. --Zeromaru[[User_talk:Zeromaru|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Zeromaru|<sup>C</sup>]] 23:57, 15 November 2005 (UTC)

Rumor: Masahiro Sakurai to be on SSB Revolution development team

I'm wondering how to include this info which I got from [[1]]. Basically it says that the guy who work on the previous Smash Brothers games but since left HAL, will help in the development in this game. 71.96.220.61 17:13, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Wow, Babelfish is a crappy translator for French. Funny, 'cause it usually translates Chinese fine for me when I need it (and I do frequently). Anyway, I'll add in this little tidbit. Thanks for the heads up :). --Zeromaru[[User_talk:Zeromaru|<sup>T</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/Zeromaru|<sup>C</sup>]] 18:42, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
Here's an English report of the Famitsu article. Looks like his return is definate. 71.96.220.61 18:53, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Please remove the "boxart"

That is completely fake, and you can even see the creator's name on the full thing. Art styles don't match, and there are two Falcos... 65.33.242.23 03:08, 23 December 2005 (UTC)Legoman

Characters Users Speculate to be on the Super Smash Brothers Revolution

Okay, we all already know everyone thinks Wario, Toad, Koopa Troopa, and Ridley will be on thier but is it true? I suspect Toad will not be on the game because he is in one of Princess Peach's moves. I also suspect the Koopa Troopa will not be in the game either because his shell has been an item since SSB1. Wario is definitly a contender though. But, has anyone considered Diddy Kong? You can come up with enough moves and he'll only be the second DK Chaacter. I've also had weak premitions about Baby Mario and Luigi could this be thier debut? And for you losers who don't that Sonic and Tails are licensed by SEGA and that the SSB series only releases characters licensed by them. If i had my way Dr. Mario would be out. He is just a copy of Mario with a different costume and his fireball is a pill.

H-BOMB 18:53, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

I really doubt that Diddy Kong could be included in Smash Brothers as I'm pretty sure he was invented by Rareware. As for me i wouldnt like to see Sonic or Tails as having non-nintendo character would kind of ruin it for me.

I'm sorry you're right about Diddy Kong but please sign your posts! And i totally agree about Sonic and Tails. H-BOMB 13:26, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

However, Diddy Kong is part of the Donkey Kong series of games, so he is technicaly owned be nintendo.--acfan-Talk to me 21:22, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm expecting Pikachu and Jigglypuff to make a return. They were in the other 2 SSB games. I also think another Pokémon will be a playable character, possibly Rayquaza (it seems to be one of the more popular Pokémon these days). I wouldn't mind having Ridley as a playable character, either. -- PinkDeoxys 21:57, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

I agree with you on Pikachu and Jigglypuff. I don't think Rayquaza will be the new Pokémon (if there is one)because they have never put in flying characters. That would be toatlly unfair to all other characters but he could have to due with a stage or Pokéball. I want to see Squirtle. And Ridley might make an apperance. H-BOMB 13:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)

For me, it seems to be about the iconic Pokémon. Pikachu is the mascot of the franchise; Jigglypuff (in the anime) is pretty well-known for being the singing Pokémon; and Mewtwo, well Mewtwo, he's the big bad guy, the creature who can think and talk and is, quite frankly, one of the coolest villans ever. He was the best character in Pokemon: The First Movie. I'm guessing that Groudon or Kyogre would be the strongest contenders, as they are non-flying and are the box art covers for Pokémon Ruby and Sapphire. - Hbdragon88 00:13, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I think Groudon could be someone to keep Bowser in check but no way on Kyogre he dosen't have legs. He's just a big fish. He wouldn't work. But I've heard good things about Crystal. H-BOMB 13:30, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Speculating on who will be in the game is fine for a forum, but doesn't have any place here. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 15:31, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

This is being moved to my talk page. H-Bomb-Talk Page 23:54, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Pointless Info

This is a encyclopedia people . Just the facts! It dosen't require Character Speculations. (That's for the Talk Page. Go to bottom of page for it.) So i'm removing the thing about Toad and Wario. 70.118.94.204 00:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)