Jump to content

Talk:Tron: Legacy/GA2: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ankitbhatt (talk | contribs)
Created page with '==GA Review== {{Good article tools}} {{subst:GAN/subst|{{subst:Tron: Legacy}}}} '''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}|{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}]] ([[User ...'
 
Ankitbhatt (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
==GA Review==
==GA Review==
{{Good article tools}}
{{Good article tools}}
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:{{subst:Tron: Legacy}}|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:{{subst:Tron: Legacy}}]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>
<noinclude>{{al|{{#titleparts:Tron: Legacy|-1}}|noname=yes}}<br/></noinclude><includeonly>:''This review is [[WP:transclusion|transcluded]] from [[Talk:Tron: Legacy]]. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''</includeonly>


'''Reviewer:''' [[User:{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}|{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}]]&nbsp;([[User talk:{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/{{subst:Ankitbhatt}}|contribs]]) 17:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
'''Reviewer:''' [[User:Ankitbhatt|Ankitbhatt]]&nbsp;([[User talk:Ankitbhatt|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Ankitbhatt|contribs]]) 17:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->
<!-- Please add all review comments below this comment, and do not alter what is above. To keep the review within a single section, please do not use level 2 headers (==...==) below to break up the review. Use level 3 (===...===), level 4 and so on.-->



Revision as of 17:11, 21 April 2012

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

[[|Article]] (edit | visual edit | history) · [[Talk:|Article talk]] (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ankitbhatt (talk · contribs) 17:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Minor points

I'm not going to do a very in-depth analysis of the article yet. However, a single look at the article throws up a few points.

  • Lead requires expansion.
  • Too many one or two-line sentences classified as separate paragraphs. I suggest merging them with other paragraphs.
  • Even in other sub-sections, there is awkward paragraph splitting. I suggest the main contributors to either collect more information and expand small paragraphs, or do some re-arranging and tweaks and collapse certain section to a smaller number of bigger paragraphs.
  • References should be checked for internal consistency. Additionally, it would be preferable if all reference titles use sentence case.
  • Try to get rid of red links. It disrupts reading flow. Either create the necessary articles or simply remove the [[]] part.

More to come. ~*~AnkitBhatt~*~ 17:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]