User talk:Darkness Shines

IP: 98.94.204.96 / 98.94.211.199 / 98.94.194.37 / ThomasC.Wolfe = same user‎

Just a heads-up that you might want to keep an eye on Clemson Tigers football for User:ThomasC.Wolfe to undo your recent revert of an IP sock. ThomasC.Wolfe is a known user of IP socks to edit war and remove sourced and notable content from articles without consensus. In addition to the IP you warned today [1], this tendentious editor has also used [2] and [3] to violate Wikipedia policy and disrupt the project in the past. Your continued vigilance would be appreciated. Thanks. GarnetAndBlack (talk) 17:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Paraphilic infantilism

Hi, though I can't prove I wasn't sockpuppeting, the IP from New Zealand wasn't me - the decision was based purely on behaviour evidence. The sources you removed are reliable, independent and adequately summarized, if you disagree then I would really appreciate it if you engage on the talk page to establish a consensus. These sources have been debated repeatedly and there has never been any consensus that they are misrepresented or inappropriate. If you're willing to review and comment on them, I welcome the input - but please don't remove good information and sources on the basis of an inconclusive sock puppeting allegation. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 18:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Darkness Shines. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nangparbat please do not waste my time like this, you need an account to send mail. Darkness Shines (talk) 19:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

IP: 129.252.69.40 / GarnetAndBlack = same user

Sorry I was unable to respond. It would have been best if you had read the talk / history pages first.[4][5] User:129.252.69.40 / User:GarnetAndBlack / User:ViperNerd / User:129.252.69.41 are all the same user. I see that you re-reverted some biased / redundant content on Clemson University related pages that User:GarnetAndBlack has been caught pushing through edit-warring / puppetry over the past several years [6][7], which he was already blocked about [8][9]. GarnetAndBlack is just trying to fool people into keeping his content there, which I see he has already done. Seems that various users have been trying to remove the actual sockpuppetry that got left on the article, not the other way around. Apologies & Thanks. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 21:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I had suspicions but not enough time to follow up, shall be a little more careful henceforth. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

I am a little overwhelmed here. Unlike troll type users, I really don't enjoy this kind of stuff. I really do appreciate you taking the time to look at this stuff. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 22:03, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

• Pardon me, but I'm confused. You "really don't enjoy this kind of stuff"? Well, a look at your User Contributions page sure paints a different picture[10]. Is that what the contributions of a "troll type user" look like? GarnetAndBlack (talk) 04:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Would you mind citing your "good faith" re-vert here: I've noticed that it's been referenced to already. [11] Best. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't see the link here? I'd prefer things that way. Happen to notice your edit got changed again? [12] Feel free to change it back, and add it to my report if it gets reverted again. [User:ThomasC.Wolfe|ThomasC.Wolfe]] (talk) 18:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry? What link were? Darkness Shines (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I just tried it. Thanks. ThomasC.Wolfe (talk) 02:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Removal of sections "US troops urinating on Taliban fighters" and "U.S. Soldiers Posing With Body Parts" in War in Afghanistan (2001–present) article

Hello. TomPointTwo pointed me to you. At the talk page of the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) article I wrote the following:

Hello. Sometimes I make contributions to topics I'm interested in. One of these topics is the ongoing War in Afghanistan. Over the course of the last days I made contributions with respect to US troops urinating on Taliban fighters and U.S. Soldiers Posing With Body Parts in order to showcase a deterioration in Afghan-American relations and the reasons therof. The sections dealing with US troops urinating on Taliban fighters and U.S. Soldiers Posing With Body Parts however have been ereased. Could me someone please explain why? Because I'm only a part time contributor could me someone also say what I can do so that the sections remain in the article after their restorement?

Two questions: 1.) Why did you delete my contributions? 2.) What can I do to make these contributions a permament part of the above mentioned article? Thanks. Orion 91.42.34.23 (talk) 21:28, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

I responded on the article talk page already, if I am wrong feel free to revert me Darkness Shines (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Can I somehow clarify the issue with respect to [13]? I am behind the users 91.42.52.147, 91.42.34.23 and 91.42.52.59, but not user 97.81.109.153. I know this because I recognize my entires with respect to the incomplete source details in Video of US troops urinating on Taliban fighters and my contributions to the US troops urinating on Taliban fighters and U.S. Soldiers Posing With Body Parts sections in the War in Afghanistan (2001–present) article to illustrate the deterioration in Afghan-American relations. Orion 91.42.34.23 (talk) 22:38, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Occupy Wall Street

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Occupy Wall Street. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Re my Talk Page

Hi. Did you perchance leave a message on my User Talk Page? There seemed to be a hint or suggestion of something and then 'poof'! Nothing. Was it anything important, that i could help out with pl? Regs, Khani100 (talk) 17:34, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Khani100