User:Robennals: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with 'I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing, so please be nice to me if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Things I've edited recently are: * David Ennals - Added...' |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* [[Martin Ennals]] - Added some bio information taken from Encyclopedia of Human rights. Since Martin in my great uncle, I've taken care to only add verifiable facts about what he did when, and avoided anything that suggests an opinion. |
* [[Martin Ennals]] - Added some bio information taken from Encyclopedia of Human rights. Since Martin in my great uncle, I've taken care to only add verifiable facts about what he did when, and avoided anything that suggests an opinion. |
||
* [[Google Go]] - Added info about the type system, which is one of the most interesting parts of the language, and wasn't talked about much. I work for Google, but I'm not connected to the Go team. |
* [[Google Go]] - Added info about the type system, which is one of the most interesting parts of the language, and wasn't talked about much. I work for Google, but I'm not connected to the Go team. |
||
* [[Intel Research]] - Created a new article about Intel Research. I used to work there, so I have some inherent bias. I took care to not mention any of my own projects, and made sure everything I said was neutral and said in a document I could cite. |
* [[Intel Research]] - Created a new article about Intel Research. I used to work there, so I have some inherent bias. I took care to not mention any of my own projects, and made sure everything I said was neutral and said in a document I could cite. I also updated a load of articles that were already talking about Intel Research, so that they linked to the new article. Intel Research is definitely notable. I included a ton of links to news articles, and can find loads more if needed. |
||
I can't claim to be completely unbiased on any of these topics, but they are all topics where I felt I had the ability to improve them, and it's hard to find articles where one both knows what one is talking about, and is completely neutral. I'd rather just be honest about my biases and trust others to notice if I'm not being objective. |
I can't claim to be completely unbiased on any of these topics, but they are all topics where I felt I had the ability to improve them, and it's hard to find articles where one both knows what one is talking about, and is completely neutral. I'd rather just be honest about my biases and trust others to notice if I'm not being objective. |
||
Latest revision as of 06:50, 23 April 2012
I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing, so please be nice to me if I'm doing something I shouldn't.
Things I've edited recently are:
- David Ennals - Added a photo and put some stuff in a onebox. David is my grandfather, so I've stayed away from other editing tasks, due to being aware that i'm biased.
- Martin Ennals - Added some bio information taken from Encyclopedia of Human rights. Since Martin in my great uncle, I've taken care to only add verifiable facts about what he did when, and avoided anything that suggests an opinion.
- Google Go - Added info about the type system, which is one of the most interesting parts of the language, and wasn't talked about much. I work for Google, but I'm not connected to the Go team.
- Intel Research - Created a new article about Intel Research. I used to work there, so I have some inherent bias. I took care to not mention any of my own projects, and made sure everything I said was neutral and said in a document I could cite. I also updated a load of articles that were already talking about Intel Research, so that they linked to the new article. Intel Research is definitely notable. I included a ton of links to news articles, and can find loads more if needed.
I can't claim to be completely unbiased on any of these topics, but they are all topics where I felt I had the ability to improve them, and it's hard to find articles where one both knows what one is talking about, and is completely neutral. I'd rather just be honest about my biases and trust others to notice if I'm not being objective.