Talk:Foster Care Independence Act: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
DYKUpdateBot (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WP_AFOD|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
{{WP_AFOD|class=C|importance=Mid}} |
||
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=mid}} |
||
{{dyktalk|23 April|2012|entry=... that [[First Lady of the United States]] [[Hillary Rodham Clinton]] was instrumental in passing the '''[[Foster Care Independence Act]]''', which funds independent living skills for youth in [[foster care]]?}} |
|||
==Foster Care Independence Act: Changes Coming Soon== |
==Foster Care Independence Act: Changes Coming Soon== |
||
Revision as of 16:04, 23 April 2012
 | Adoption, fostering, orphan care and displacement (inactive) | |||
| ||||
 | United States C‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | A fact from Foster Care Independence Act appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 April 2012 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Foster Care Independence Act: Changes Coming Soon
Hi there, although it seems like this page has not been getting much traffic, I wanted to let folks know that I am currently working on updating this page. I should have all the new changes posted within a few days. Although I have used some of the sources already existing, I will be deleting everything on the current page. I am updating the page through the Wikimedia project as part of a MPA public policy class. Any feedback would be much appreciated once the article is posted. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, Jrose88 (talk) 05:10, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- OK, we'll see what you come up with. You can see from this page views site that this article gets about 600 views a month. Wasted Time R (talk) 05:46, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hi all, page has been updated! Thanks Jrose88 (talk) 17:20, 15 April 2012 (UTC)
Article Rating
Upon DYK review, it is clear to me that article is of a now substantial quality to warrant a C-Class rating. With some more work and expansion, it could easily get to a B class article without too much effort. Great work so far, and keep it up Kayz911 (talk) 18:52, 16 April 2012 (UTC)