User talk:167.176.16.8

Regarding edits made during March 28 2007 (UTC) to Oscar R Gonzales

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any unconstructive edits. Myanw 13:54, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Stop loss policy

I like your additions to the Stop loss policy article. I wish I would have thought of that myself. Equinox137 (talk) 22:55, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at McCarthy Stadium, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Camden Catholic High School, you will be blocked from editing. Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Bagni, you will be blocked from editing. 69.1.9.242 (talk) 09:17, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to British International School Prague, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. Meaghan ^:) ≈ 23:57, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iota Nu Delta

The article Iota Nu Delta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not wikipedia or independently notable fraternity group

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 01:53, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Iota Nu Delta

The article Iota Nu Delta has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not wikipedia or independently notable fraternity group

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Off2riorob (talk) 01:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Iota Nu Delta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Iota Nu Delta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iota Nu Delta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 13:11, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 16:04, 2 May 2012 (UTC)