Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leo Ford (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Nintendude64 (talk | contribs) |
Ground Zero (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources|Leo Ford}}) |
:({{Find sources|Leo Ford}}) |
||
Article fails on all three bullet points for [[WP:PORNBIO]]: No significant awards to his name, no unique contributions, and no notable mentions in mainstream media. |
Article fails on all three bullet points for [[WP:PORNBIO]]: No significant awards to his name, no unique contributions, and no notable mentions in mainstream media. |
||
*'''Keep''' - satisfies [[WP:BASIC]] - "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Several independent published sources. Connection to the Smiths makes this an interesting article. Wikipedia would not be improved by deleting this article. [[User:Ground Zero|Ground Zero]] | [[User talk:Ground Zero|t]] 17:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 17:27, 6 May 2012
AfDs for this article:
- Leo Ford (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article fails on all three bullet points for WP:PORNBIO: No significant awards to his name, no unique contributions, and no notable mentions in mainstream media.
- Keep - satisfies WP:BASIC - "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject." Several independent published sources. Connection to the Smiths makes this an interesting article. Wikipedia would not be improved by deleting this article. Ground Zero | t 17:27, 6 May 2012 (UTC)