Talk:Yahoo: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Gintyfrench (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
* '''Oppose''' the main article is already way too cluttered. [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 00:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
* '''Oppose''' the main article is already way too cluttered. [[User:Ottawahitech|Ottawahitech]] ([[User talk:Ottawahitech|talk]]) 00:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC) |
||
*I agree because if the article is about Yahoo! then it should include all information about Yahoo!, unless the article become extremely long. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DK3535|DK3535]] ([[User talk:DK3535|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK3535|contribs]]) 19:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
*I agree because if the article is about Yahoo! then it should include all information about Yahoo!, unless the article become extremely long. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:DK3535|DK3535]] ([[User talk:DK3535|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/DK3535|contribs]]) 19:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
*'''Agree'''. The article is far too short to be worthwhile on its own. Could be included as a short paragraph/sentence on the main Yahoo! article. The fact that the main Yahoo! page is cluttered is an argument for de-cluttering that page, not an argument against merging this one. [[User:gintyfrench|<font color="red">'''Ginty'''</font><font color="jade">'''French'''</font>]][[User_talk:gintyfrench|<sup><font color="teal">(talk!)</font></sup>]] 14:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC) |
|||
== [[Death and the Internet]] == |
== [[Death and the Internet]] == |
Revision as of 14:29, 14 May 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yahoo article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
Yahoo received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Other media/trivia
Should there be any mention that in the film Frequency the character Gordo gets a second chance at becoming wealthy by investing in Yahoo! stock while it was affordable?
- I don't see it menntioned in film Frequency?Ottawahitech (talk) 00:47, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Merger Proposal
I propose that Yahoo! Green be merged into Yahoo!. I think that the content in the Yahoo Green article can easily be explained in the context of Yahoo!, and the Yahoo! article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Yahoo! Green will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Fumitol|talk|cont 02:46, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
- I agree. It is a one line article as of now. It is better off as part of the main page. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 04:45, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
- I also agree. It would be best conviniently merged into that same page. ~
⇒TomTomN00 @ 21:44, 29 February 2012 (UTC)
- Agrred As well would be a good thing and its part of yahoo right ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.237.224.42 (talk) 15:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
- I agree.CurlyPop88 (talk) 19:47, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose the main article is already way too cluttered. Ottawahitech (talk) 00:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I agree because if the article is about Yahoo! then it should include all information about Yahoo!, unless the article become extremely long. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DK3535 (talk • contribs) 19:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
- Agree. The article is far too short to be worthwhile on its own. Could be included as a short paragraph/sentence on the main Yahoo! article. The fact that the main Yahoo! page is cluttered is an argument for de-cluttering that page, not an argument against merging this one. GintyFrench(talk!) 14:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)
Just wondering why Yahoo! has no section on the page Death and the Internet? Ottawahitech (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Employee layoffs
As reported by Wired, Yahoo! has just announced the layoff of some two thousand staff. Should this be added to employee stats? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.173.162.33 (talk) 16:40, 4 April 2012 (UTC)
Error message trying to access Yahoo's press room
I get the following message when I try to access the pressroom (see external links at article page):
- The web site you are accessing has experienced an unexpected error.
- Please contact the website administrator.
Anyone else? Ottawahitech (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did a search for Yahoo Press Room, and got a different site. Updated external links to reflect this. swinquest (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Swinquest. It's good you found another type of press room for Yahoo, however the one I had put in is the one Yahoo uses to communicate with shareholders in their language. Ottawahitech (talk) 22:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Wow the Yahoo! shareholder website still malfunctions? Ottawahitech (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- I did a search for Yahoo Press Room, and got a different site. Updated external links to reflect this. swinquest (talk) 16:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Old requests for peer review
- All unassessed articles
- C-Class Internet articles
- Top-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- C-Class Internet culture articles
- Top-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- C-Class Websites articles
- Top-importance Websites articles
- C-Class Websites articles of Top-importance
- C-Class Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Websites articles
- C-Class company articles
- Top-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- C-Class California articles
- High-importance California articles
- C-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Mid-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- C-Class Stanford University articles
- Low-importance Stanford University articles
- WikiProject Stanford University articles
- C-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles