Talk:Vadda Ghalughara: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:05, 18 May 2012

Sikhism C‑class

This article is part of WikiProject Sikhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Sikhism. Please participate by editing the article, or visit the project page for more details on the projects.

Guidelines: Manual of Style - Naming conventionsSikhismWikipedia:WikiProject SikhismTemplate:WikiProject SikhismSikhism

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

India: Punjab / History Start‑class Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Punjab portal This article is supported by WikiProject Punjab (India) (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Mid-importance).

POV Check

Generally, the factual outline seems reasonable. However, the POV seems to be clearly biased in favor of a particular political/sectarian reading of history. This bias is reinforced in the sources used, all of which upon at least cursory examination are highly partial to one particular viewpoint. IronSheep (talk) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The POV of this article is an issue. It sets it up as Muslims V Sikhs, while it seems to be a conflict by an invading Nation. Which happen to be Muslims. These people who happen to be Muslim did not kill the Sikhs because they were Sikhs. Just like in Darfur was there a religious motive (both side shared the same religion). So we cannot confuse religion in a conflict over land and conquest.Same is true for Indira's attack on the Sikh temple, it was not a religious issue.--Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ (talk) 11:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ITS MISSING A WHOLE POINT ON HOW DID THE SIKHS THEN TAKE BACK HARI MANDIR SAHIB???? THERES NO ACCOUNT OF IT ON THE PAGE, DOESNT MAKE SENSE, THIS ARTICLE NEEDS CLEANING UP AND PUT IN CHRONILOGICAL ORDER OF EVENTS. VERY CONFUSING!!!!!

After holocaust

The flow of this article seems abrupt; a brief section on the later events and activities of the Sikhs after the holocaust would be helpful. -- Roadahead ★ 22:50, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article name

What is the preferred transliteration scheme for Punjabi ? In particular, should ਘੱਲੂਘਾਰਾ be transliterated into English as:

Ghalooghaaraa
Ghalughara
something else ?

Ditto, for the article Chhotaa Ghallooghaaraa. Abecedare (talk) 20:34, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 Generally, the factual outline seems reasonable. However, the POV seems to be clearly biased in favor of a particular political/sectarian reading of history. This bias is reinforced in the sources used, all of which upon at least cursory examination are highly partial to one particular viewpoint. [[User:IronSheep|IronSheep]] ([[User talk:IronSheep|talk]]) 04:47, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
 :::The POV of this article is an issue. It sets it up as Muslims V Sikhs, while it seems to be a conflict by an invading Nation. Which happen to be Muslims. These people who happen to be Muslim did not kill the Sikhs because they were Sikhs. Just like in Darfur was there a religious motive (both side shared the same religion). So we cannot confuse religion in a conflict over land and conquest.Same is true for Indira's attack on the Sikh temple, it was not a religious issue.--[[User:Halaqah|Halqh حَلَقَة הלכהሐላቃህ]] ([[User talk:Halaqah|talk]]) 11:50, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
+ITS MISSING A WHOLE POINT ON HOW DID THE SIKHS THEN TAKE BACK HARI MANDIR SAHIB???? THERES NO ACCOUNT OF IT ON THE PAGE, DOESNT MAKE SENSE, THIS ARTICLE NEEDS CLEANING UP AND PUT IN CHRONILOGICAL ORDER OF EVENTS. VERY CONFUSING!!!!!
 == After holocaust ==