Jump to content

User talk:No parking here: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Oslo Freedom Forum: new section
Line 50: Line 50:


Is there anything to discuss? --[[User:No parking here|No parking here]] ([[User talk:No parking here#top|talk]]) 13:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Is there anything to discuss? --[[User:No parking here|No parking here]] ([[User talk:No parking here#top|talk]]) 13:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

== Oslo Freedom Forum ==

Please stop reverting the changes and participate in the talk page discussion if you have something new to add. I am going to bring this up with the admins now due to the multiple reverts with no explanation or discussion. [[User:Wrathofjames|Wrathofjames]] ([[User talk:Wrathofjames|talk]]) 22:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:05, 20 May 2012

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sju hav for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. meco (talk) 12:18, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, No parking here. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! meco (talk) 17:50, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Members list on AUF article

Hey!

I've been reverting your edits recently of the list of members on the AUF article. This is not because I believe their history is not a part of AUF - saying so would be silly - but as the article stands, the content is not worked into the article in a good way. My humble suggestion is that if you wish this content to be a part of the article, you make it a part of the organizational history.

Regards, and keep on contributing, toresbe 16:11, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Workers%27_Youth_League_(Norway)&oldid=492499117#Members_list --No parking here (talk) 09:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"not suitable as a first paragraph"

Just as a little note, since I wont violate the 3RR rule, so what I in other cases would have written in an edit summary, I write here: Toresbe removed the paragraph and called it not suitable as a first paragraph, after you have changed the meaning from former leaders to former members. The paragraph you now removed have been in the article for some time, without Toresbe removing it. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:47, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Talk:Workers'_Youth_League_(Norway)#.22not_suitable_as_a_first_paragraph.22. --No parking here (talk) 19:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of bold in discussions

... is a bit vexing. Do you think you could use italics instead, like most people who, like you, have an exorbitant need to make emphasis? __meco (talk) 20:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sculpture park in Oslo

A sculpture park in Oslo has already started its construction Ekebergåsen.

http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/ostlandssendingen/1.8144166

http://www.aftenposten.no/kultur/Politiet-etterforsker-mulig-korrupsjon-i-Oslo-kommune-6831830.html

http://www.dn.no/forsiden/politikkSamfunn/article2400333.ece

Is there anything to discuss? --No parking here (talk) 13:21, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oslo Freedom Forum

Please stop reverting the changes and participate in the talk page discussion if you have something new to add. I am going to bring this up with the admins now due to the multiple reverts with no explanation or discussion. Wrathofjames (talk) 22:05, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]