Talk:Lydia Sigourney: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Now I have joined those together. There is a bit more to do, but the article seems to be a fairly vaild resource, now. --[[User:Mkoyle|Matthew]] 06:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC) |
Now I have joined those together. There is a bit more to do, but the article seems to be a fairly vaild resource, now. --[[User:Mkoyle|Matthew]] 06:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
The American children's writer category is rather appropriate since she did write what might be termed primers; I would not really call her a children's author in the current sense. Anyway, I am leaving the children's author category and adding the "American author" category again. --[[User:Mkoyle|Matthew]] 00:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:36, 21 April 2006
Rationale
It looks like three different people have just dumped public domain info into the article without bothering with any logical formatting. --Closedmouth 11:52, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
There were two separate articles about Sigourney under similar names; I joined the articles and for lack of time put the two articles into a single article. I plan to process these down to something more . . . attractive and readable soon. I will probably move the large list of works to a separate page and incorporate something of a biographical sketch I wrote for the Victorian Web. --Matthew 07:56, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
Now I have joined those together. There is a bit more to do, but the article seems to be a fairly vaild resource, now. --Matthew 06:31, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
The American children's writer category is rather appropriate since she did write what might be termed primers; I would not really call her a children's author in the current sense. Anyway, I am leaving the children's author category and adding the "American author" category again. --Matthew 00:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)