Talk:Leibniz's notation: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
"(One mathematician, Jerome Keisler, has gone so far as to write a first-year-calculus textbook according to Robinson's point of view.)" Why don't you tell us the name of the textbook, given that you tell us it exists? [[User:GangofOne|GangofOne]] 00:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
"(One mathematician, Jerome Keisler, has gone so far as to write a first-year-calculus textbook according to Robinson's point of view.)" Why don't you tell us the name of the textbook, given that you tell us it exists? [[User:GangofOne|GangofOne]] 00:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC) |
||
:GIYF: http://www.math.wisc.edu/~keisler/calc.html [[User:TomJF|TomJF]] 00:37, 21 April 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:37, 21 April 2006
Needs work
This article needs a lot of work. The second paragraph (not the line, the paragraph) is nearly incoherent. The closing statement describing units merely hints at what I wanted to know. Maybe it's somewhere else; in that case, a link will be needed.
-Malakai
- Does this look better now? Fresheneesz 00:17, 11 February 2006 (UTC)
"(One mathematician, Jerome Keisler, has gone so far as to write a first-year-calculus textbook according to Robinson's point of view.)" Why don't you tell us the name of the textbook, given that you tell us it exists? GangofOne 00:22, 11 February 2006 (UTC)