Talk:Glaucus atlanticus: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:28, 26 May 2012

Gastropods Start‑class High‑importance

	Gastropods portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Gastropods, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of gastropods on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GastropodsWikipedia:WikiProject GastropodsTemplate:WikiProject GastropodsGastropods articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taxonomy: For all marine species, Project Gastropods uses the taxonomy in the online database WoRMS. When starting a new article, do not use sources of taxonomic information that predate the 2017 revision for all gastropod groups ("Revised Classification, Nomenclator and Typification of Gastropod and Monoplacophoran Families" by Philippe Bouchet & Jean-Pierre Rocroi, Bernhard Hausdorf, Andrzej Kaim, Yasunori Kano, Alexander Nützel, Pavel Parkhaev, Michael Schrödl and Ellen E. Strong in Malacologia, 2017, 61(1–2): 1–526.) (can be dowloaded at Researchgate.net), substituting the previous classification of 2005 Taxonomy of the Gastropoda (Bouchet & Rocroi, 2005). If you need help with any aspect of an article, please leave a note at the Project talk page.

Shriveling

"4cm long when alive" -- Why make the distinction? Do they get longer when they die? I'm removing the qualifier.

maybe they shrivel? I don't know. Orcahuman (talk) 18:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They are pelagic. Most users will encounter them washed up on the shoreline, not in a pristine state. Qualification was probably useful. Shoka, not logged in

Glaucilla confusion

I just rewrote the intro to clear up confusion regarding Glaucilla marginata. Let me know if I've gotten anything wrong. AstarothCY (talk) 13:26, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Importance

I changed the importance to high, because this article is surprisingly often consulted. Invertzoo (talk) 13:20, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Foot?

"It has dark blue stripes along the edge of its foot." Does whatever it has qualify as a foot? - Anton Nordenfur (talk) 00:04, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Apparantly the dorsal side is classified as its foot. I have to read up on slugs. - Anton Nordenfur (talk) 00:24, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"True Story?"

Every photo of this on the internet looks horribly fake. Are these real, and if so, can we get something less photoshopped looking? 65.27.134.29 (talk) 01:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Ubiquitousnewt[reply]

Yes, they are real. Unfortunately, I don't have any photos to give, but I can tell you they're real because I've seen them with my own eyes. :] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.161.28 (talk) 12:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:27, 26 May 2012 edit 75.185.161.28 (talk) →"True Story?" ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:28, 26 May 2012 edit undo SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,554,302 edits m Signing comment by 75.185.161.28 - "→"True Story?": " Next edit →
Line 24:		Line 24:
	[[Special:Contributions/65.27.134.29\|65.27.134.29]] ([[User talk:65.27.134.29\|talk]]) 01:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Ubiquitousnewt		[[Special:Contributions/65.27.134.29\|65.27.134.29]] ([[User talk:65.27.134.29\|talk]]) 01:57, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Ubiquitousnewt

	Yes, they are real. Unfortunately, I don't have any photos to give, but I can tell you they're real because I've seen them with my own eyes. :]		Yes, they are real. Unfortunately, I don't have any photos to give, but I can tell you they're real because I've seen them with my own eyes. :] <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/75.185.161.28\|75.185.161.28]] ([[User talk:75.185.161.28\|talk]]) 12:27, 26 May 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->