Talk:Helium hydride ion: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→Incorrect image: not same size |
Double sharp (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
The current image is misleading - HHe<sup>+</sup> is isoelectronic with H<sub>2</sub>, and therefore the two atoms in the cation should have identical size. [[User:Whoop whoop pull up|Whoop whoop pull up]] <sup>[[User talk:Whoop whoop pull up|Bitching Betty]] | [[Special:Contributions/Whoop whoop pull up|Averted crashes]]</sup> 02:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC) |
The current image is misleading - HHe<sup>+</sup> is isoelectronic with H<sub>2</sub>, and therefore the two atoms in the cation should have identical size. [[User:Whoop whoop pull up|Whoop whoop pull up]] <sup>[[User talk:Whoop whoop pull up|Bitching Betty]] | [[Special:Contributions/Whoop whoop pull up|Averted crashes]]</sup> 02:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC) |
||
:I doubt they are the same size. With a higher charge on the nucleus the He+ would be smaller. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 08:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
:I doubt they are the same size. With a higher charge on the nucleus the He+ would be smaller. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 08:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
::Then the image is still wrong, because it shows the He<sup>+</sup> (cyan) larger than the H (silver). [[User:Double sharp|Double sharp]] ([[User talk:Double sharp|talk]]) 15:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:00, 30 May 2012
Chemistry C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
References
Hiby, Julius W. (1939). "Massenspektrographische Untersuchungen an Wasserstoff- und Heliumkanalstrahlen (H3+, H2-, HeH+, HeD+, He-)". Annalen der Physik. 426 (5): 473–487. doi:10.1002/andp.19394260506. First 1986? --Stone (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
- Even earlier: Coulson, C. A.; Duncanson, W. E. (1938). "Comparison of Wave-Functions for HeH++ and HeH+". Proc. Roy. Soc. A. 165: 90. doi:10.1098/rspa.1938.0047.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). Apparently "first studied by Wolfgang Ketterle in 1986" refers to the first spectroscopic studies of the neutral helium hydride. I found these two papers by Ketterle: W. Ketterle, H. Figger, and H. Walther (1985). "Emission spectra of bound helium hydride". Phys. Rev. Lett. 55: 2941–2944. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.2941.{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link); W Ketterle, A Dodhy, H Walther (1986). "Bound—free emission of the helium hydride molecule". Chemical Physics Letters. 129 (1): 76–78. doi:10.1016/0009-2614(86)80172-5.{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link). --Itub (talk) 15:47, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Move to Helium hydride ion?
After a quick literature search, I'm left with the impression that helium hydride ion and helium hydride molecular ion are used much more often than hydrohelium ion. (Actually, the most common is HeH+, but I'd rather use words.) Should we rename the article?
- Just thinking aloud, "hydride" suggests a H- in there, which seems a bit strange. Is that what people really call it? --Rifleman 82 (talk) 09:47, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- That's exactly what I thought, but people do call it that way. I suppose the rationale is that the neutral molecule, HeH, is reasonably called helium hydride (unless you want to call it hydrogen heliide?), so this cation is the molecular ion (in the mass spectrometry sense) of helium hydride. --Itub (talk) 09:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- The rename sounds like a good idea. Use the most common term that's not an abbreviation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:00, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
Incorrect image
The current image is misleading - HHe+ is isoelectronic with H2, and therefore the two atoms in the cation should have identical size. Whoop whoop pull up Bitching Betty | Averted crashes 02:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
- I doubt they are the same size. With a higher charge on the nucleus the He+ would be smaller. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:06, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
- Then the image is still wrong, because it shows the He+ (cyan) larger than the H (silver). Double sharp (talk) 15:00, 30 May 2012 (UTC)