Template:Did you know nominations/M16 (rocket): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
end of the review |
ce |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> |
--> |
||
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]]The article is new and long enough (1,698 characters), within the policy. The hook is not to long (93 characters). AGF on sources being offline. '''A note''' to user who will promote this hook: The article actually says ''only a single engagement was <u>confirmed</u>''. If that could mean that there could |
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]]The article is new and long enough (1,698 characters), within the policy. The hook is not to long (93 characters). AGF on sources being offline. '''A note''' to user who will promote this hook: The article actually says ''only a single engagement was <u>confirmed</u>''. If that could mean that there could have been more engagements of M16 during WWII which were not confirmed, then hook should be ammended to clarify this. --[[User:Antidiskriminator|Antidiskriminator]] ([[User talk:Antidiskriminator|talk]]) 19:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 19:10, 31 May 2012
M16 (rocket)
- ... that the M16 (launcher pictured) was used in only a single engagement of the Second World War?
- Reviewed: Fraser-Darling effect
Created/expanded by The Bushranger (talk). Self nom at 22:19, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
The article is new and long enough (1,698 characters), within the policy. The hook is not to long (93 characters). AGF on sources being offline. A note to user who will promote this hook: The article actually says only a single engagement was confirmed. If that could mean that there could have been more engagements of M16 during WWII which were not confirmed, then hook should be ammended to clarify this. --Antidiskriminator (talk) 19:00, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
