Talk:Grumpy Old Man: Difference between revisions
Glimmer721 (talk | contribs) Correct subtopic |
No edit summary |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{WikiProject Television|episode-coverage=Yes|class=Start|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Television|episode-coverage=Yes|class=Start|importance=low}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{GA nominee|14:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)|nominator=[[Special:Contributions/116.49.196.163|116.49.196.163]] ([[User talk:116.49.196.163|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Episodes|status= |
{{GA nominee|14:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC)|nominator=[[Special:Contributions/116.49.196.163|116.49.196.163]] ([[User talk:116.49.196.163|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Episodes|status=onhold|note=}} |
||
== Grumpy Old Man (episode) == |
== Grumpy Old Man (episode) == |
Revision as of 08:50, 2 June 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Grumpy Old Man article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Grumpy Old Man is currently a Episodes good article nominee. Nominated by 116.49.196.163 (talk) at 14:32, 30 May 2012 (UTC) An editor has placed this article on hold to allow improvements to be made to satisfy the good article criteria. Recommendations have been left on the review page, and editors have seven days to address these issues. Improvements made in this period will influence the reviewer's decision whether or not to list the article as a good article.
|
Grumpy Old Man (episode)
Shouldn't this be listed as an episode (Or Family Guy episode)? I was directed here from Victor Meldrew, which describes the grumpy old man archetype.Magicwalltree (talk) 21:28, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Grumpy Old Man/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Koopatrev (talk · contribs) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
I will review this article soon (before June 4, 2012).Koopatrev (talk) 14:35, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Reviewing now. Koopatrev (talk) 08:48, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
Prose and Images
- Prose is fine, well written
- Images are of good quality and clear, they are tagged with copyright statuses and has a suitable caption on
Infobox
- The writers should be listed in two lines with <br /> Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Lead
- "The episode originally aired on Fox in the United States on December 11, 2011." "United States" could be linked. Done Per Wiki Manual of Style, this isn't necessary.--Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Plot
- "Carter is reluctant at first (since he doesn't want to leave out a six-billion dollar company), but eventually ..." Change "doesn't" to "does not". Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- Link the first "Joe" you can see to "Joe Swanson" Done by --Gen. Quon (talk) 03:49, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
Cultural references
- A source is needed for the first statement in that paragraph.
- See this section for problems with sources. Done (change done by TBrandley (talk)) Koopatrev (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Production and development
Nothing wrong so far. Done
Reception
- A section is needed for reviews from critics.
References
- Family Guy Wiki is not a reliable source. Done (change done by Tbrandley (talk)) Koopatrev (talk) 06:41, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
I'm going to put this on hold until these problems are solved.
This article is going to fail if no changes/improvements are to be made by June 9, 2012, 08:48 (UTC).Koopatrev (talk) 06:36, 3 June 2012 (UTC)
Final review (template)
- Final review (sorry I'm over an hour late but that's ok) Koopatrev (talk) 10:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
1. It is well written.
- Prose quality:
- Follows MOS:
2. It is factually accurate and verifiable;.:
- References to sources:
- Citations to reliable sources, where required:
- No original research:
- The "cultural references" section is still lacking some sources for some statements. In source 3 you don't really see anything that says anything about the cultural references of this episode.
3. It is broad in coverage:
- Major aspects:
The section for reviews from critics in the "reception" section is still missing. However there is still a part for U.S. viewers and ratings.
- Focused:
4. It is written in a neutral point of view.:
- Fair representation without bias:
5. Reasonably stable?
- No edit wars etc:
6. Includes images, where appropriate.:
- Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Sorry this probably has to fail, some parts are still lacking information.
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Comedy articles
- Low-importance Comedy articles
- WikiProject Comedy articles
- Start-Class Animation articles
- Mid-importance Animation articles
- Start-Class Animation articles of Mid-importance
- Start-Class Family Guy articles
- Mid-importance Family Guy articles
- Family Guy work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- Start-Class Episode coverage articles
- Unknown-importance Episode coverage articles
- Episode coverage task force articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees currently on hold
- Good article nominees on review