Talk:Nia Technique: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:07, 7 June 2012

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Simply, we have no secondary sources. We have not met WP:N. The only source is WP:SELFPUB. The two external links should be intergrated as sources and the article should be written from them with a careful eye to WP:SPAM and WP:NPOV. --Ronz (talk) 15:04, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Given the promotional nature of the article and the lack of references, I have removed the additional link to nianow.com per WP:EL, WP:SPAM, and WP:NOT#LINK. --Ronz (talk) 15:09, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost borderline about whether the article should remain or be deleted, although it does appear to be offered in a number of cities--Vannin (talk) 16:00, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There are sources for this [1] [2] [3] although unfortunately a lot of the news ones are pay-to-view. Sticky Parkin 01:37, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a movement form which is practiced in a variety of places. I learned about it in More magazine and have participated in different studios in Austin and San Antonio. I am not a Wikipedia editor and have no idea how to improve this article to meet your editing guidelines because it seems that Wikipedia has a complicated set of rules, but if the idea is to find articles about the subject in publications that are not related to the subject, I can do so. Edwinarkie, July 14, 2010 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edwinarkie (talk • contribs) 04:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over three years, and we've one independent source that borders on a puff-piece. If no one is interested in doing the work to make this even resemble something encyclopedic, let's trim it down to a stub to address so it doesn't look like an advertisement. --Ronz (talk) 15:43, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I dont know the history of this article. And I dont care. I wanted to know more about nia before practicing it and I saw, there is no adequate info in my usual source of information. I could add, what I saw, independent references are scarce, therefore I added the one part - business model - which I suppose no one knows at the start with nia and there is no interpretation. I'd like to kind of complete the article but would be even more interested in a comparison of different fitness disciplines like we have it on software tools. Actually I'm looking into Zumba. There the business model I didnt unerstand yet. --Rolerus (talk) 09:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without independent and reliable sources, it minimally violates WP:NPOV and WP:SOAP. --Ronz (talk) 17:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 06:57, 28 April 2012 edit Rolerus (talk \| contribs) 6 edits →Advert ← Previous edit		Revision as of 17:07, 7 June 2012 edit undo Hipal (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 137,994 edits →Advert Next edit →
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I dont know the history of this article. And I dont care. I wanted to know more about nia before practicing it and I saw, there is no adequate info in my usual source of information. I could add, what I saw, independent references are scarce, therefore I added the one part - business model - which I suppose no one knows at the start with nia and there is no interpretation. I'd like to kind of complete the article but would be even more interested in a comparison of different fitness disciplines like we have it on software tools. Actually I'm looking into Zumba. There the business model I didnt unerstand yet. --[[User:Rolerus\|Rolerus]] ([[User talk:Rolerus\|talk]]) 09:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)		I dont know the history of this article. And I dont care. I wanted to know more about nia before practicing it and I saw, there is no adequate info in my usual source of information. I could add, what I saw, independent references are scarce, therefore I added the one part - business model - which I suppose no one knows at the start with nia and there is no interpretation. I'd like to kind of complete the article but would be even more interested in a comparison of different fitness disciplines like we have it on software tools. Actually I'm looking into Zumba. There the business model I didnt unerstand yet. --[[User:Rolerus\|Rolerus]] ([[User talk:Rolerus\|talk]]) 09:53, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
			:Without independent and reliable sources, it minimally violates [[WP:NPOV]] and [[WP:SOAP]]. --[[User:Ronz\|Ronz]] ([[User talk:Ronz\|talk]]) 17:07, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:07, 7 June 2012

Advert