Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 19: Line 19:


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======
I blocked it as a [[WP:DUCK]]. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 16:46, 13 June 2012 (UTC)
I blocked it as a [[WP:DUCK]].

However, this report may be mis-filed. I see no evidence that this is a sock of TungstenCarbide. In fact, this sockpuppet was claiming to belong to TungstenCarbide by putting {{tl|sockpuppet}} tags on other sock pages. See the contribution history. ~[[User:Amatulic|Amatulić]] <small>([[User talk:Amatulic#top|talk]])</small> 16:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)


----
----

Revision as of 16:49, 13 June 2012

TungstenCarbide

TungstenCarbide (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TungstenCarbide/Archive.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

13 June 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

This is rather obvious. The reason for CheckUser is because this was a sleeper sock that just came to life. Jasper Deng (talk) 16:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.


Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

I blocked it as a WP:DUCK.

However, this report may be mis-filed. I see no evidence that this is a sock of TungstenCarbide. In fact, this sockpuppet was claiming to belong to TungstenCarbide by putting {{sockpuppet}} tags on other sock pages. See the contribution history. ~Amatulić (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]