Jump to content

Grafton Elliot Smith: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:
==European hypothesis==
==European hypothesis==


British anthropologists [[Arthur Keith]] and Grafton Elliot Smith were both fixed on [[Out of Europe theory|European origin of humankind]] and were in opposition to models of Asian and African origin.<ref>Handbook of paleoanthropology, volume 1, Winfriend Henke, Thorolf Hardt, p. 31</ref> In several of his works, Smith argued that Europe was the cradle of humanity, identifying a European [[Mediterranean race]] as the occupants of the original home of modern humans. His cradle was large, as he claimed the Mediterranean race had occupied the [[Levant]], [[Egypt]] and western Europe, including the [[British isles]]. He especially linked the Mediterranean race to the civilization of Egypt. Smith's arguments later became known as his theory of [[diffusionism]].<ref>Archeological theory, who sets the agenda? Norman Yoffee, Andrew Sherratt, p. 47</ref> According to Smith and [[William James Perry]] Egypt was the source of all cultural innovations and the ultimate source of human civilization.<ref>Ian Shaw ''A Dictionary of Archaeology'' 2002, p. 200</ref>
British anthropologists [[Arthur Keith]] and Grafton Elliot Smith were both fixed on the [[Out of Europe theory|European origin of humankind]] and were in opposition to models of [[Out of Asia theory|Asian]] and African origin.<ref>Handbook of paleoanthropology, volume 1, Winfriend Henke, Thorolf Hardt, p. 31</ref> In several of his works, Smith argued that Europe was the cradle of humanity, identifying a European [[Mediterranean race]] as the occupants of the original home of modern humans. His cradle was large, as he claimed the Mediterranean race had occupied the [[Levant]], [[Egypt]] and western Europe, including the [[British isles]]. He especially linked the Mediterranean race to the civilization of Egypt. Smith's arguments later became known as his theory of [[diffusionism]].<ref>Archeological theory, who sets the agenda? Norman Yoffee, Andrew Sherratt, p. 47</ref> According to Smith and [[William James Perry]] Egypt was the source of all cultural innovations and the ultimate source of human civilization.<ref>Ian Shaw ''A Dictionary of Archaeology'' 2002, p. 200</ref>


According to Smith “Man did not become truly erect until his brain had developed in a very particular way to make it possible for him to use his hands”, this line of reasoning reinforced the European origin of human which both Smith and Arthur Keith supported as the mostly large brained specimens such as the [[Cro-magnon]] had been found in Europe.<ref>Studying human origins, disciplinary history and epistemology, Raymond Corbey, Wil Roebroeks, p. 51</ref>
According to Smith “Man did not become truly erect until his brain had developed in a very particular way to make it possible for him to use his hands”, this line of reasoning reinforced the European origin of human which both Smith and Arthur Keith supported as the mostly large brained specimens such as the [[Cro-magnon]] had been found in Europe.<ref>Studying human origins, disciplinary history and epistemology, Raymond Corbey, Wil Roebroeks, p. 51</ref>

Revision as of 21:19, 14 June 2012

Grafton Elliot Smith
Born15 August 1871
Died1 January 1937
NationalityAustralia
Alma materUniversity of Sydney
Parent(s)Stephen Sheldrick Smith
Mary Jane Smith, née Evans
AwardsFRS[1]
Scientific career
Fieldsanatomist
archaeological

Sir Grafton Elliot Smith, FRS[1] FRCP (15 August 1871 – 1 January 1937) was an Australian-British anatomist and a proponent of the hyperdiffusionist view of prehistory.

Professional career

Smith was born in Grafton, New South Wales. He attended Sydney Boys High School[2], he was awarded a degree in medicine at the University of Sydney (Doctor of Medicine in 1895, with a dissertation on the fore-brain of the monotremes) and developed an interest in the anatomy of the human brain. He held a travelling scholarship at Cambridge in 1896, then he catalogued the human brain-collection of the British Museum. From 1900-1909 he was the first chairholder of anatomy at the Cairo School of Medicine and investigated the brains of Egyptian mummies. He was the first scholar to x-ray a mummy.

In 1907 he became archaeological advisor to the archaeological survey of Nubia. From 1909-1919 he was Professor for anatomy in Manchester, 1919-1937 he held the chair of Anatomy at the University College London. During World War I he attended military hospitals for shell shock and served on the British General Medical Council.

Smith was the leading specialist on the evolution of the brain of his day.[3] Many of his ideas on the evolution of the primate brain still form the core of present scholarship. He proposed the following stages of development:

  1. a smell-dominated insectivore of the jumping shrew-type
  2. vision-dominated animals with an expanded cortex of tree-shrew-type
  3. acutely visioned, manually dexterous mammals of tarsius-type
  4. monkeys
  5. anthropoids using their hands to use and produce tools

He was decorated by the Khedive of Egypt, Abbas Hilmy in 1909. He became Fellow of the Royal Society[1], FRCP, cross of the French Legion of Honour, and was knighted in 1934. In 1912 he received the Royal Medal of the Royal Society, in 1930 the Honorary Gold Medal of the Royal College of Surgeons, in 1936 the Huxley Memorial Medal from the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.

European hypothesis

British anthropologists Arthur Keith and Grafton Elliot Smith were both fixed on the European origin of humankind and were in opposition to models of Asian and African origin.[4] In several of his works, Smith argued that Europe was the cradle of humanity, identifying a European Mediterranean race as the occupants of the original home of modern humans. His cradle was large, as he claimed the Mediterranean race had occupied the Levant, Egypt and western Europe, including the British isles. He especially linked the Mediterranean race to the civilization of Egypt. Smith's arguments later became known as his theory of diffusionism.[5] According to Smith and William James Perry Egypt was the source of all cultural innovations and the ultimate source of human civilization.[6]

According to Smith “Man did not become truly erect until his brain had developed in a very particular way to make it possible for him to use his hands”, this line of reasoning reinforced the European origin of human which both Smith and Arthur Keith supported as the mostly large brained specimens such as the Cro-magnon had been found in Europe.[7]

Hyperdiffusionism

The term 'hyperdiffusionism' seems to have been coined by the British archaeologist Glyn Daniel in his book The Idea of Prehistory (1962) with a somewhat derogatory intention. It was intended to represent extremes of diffusionism, a theme popular in early 20th century archaeology that itself has been subject to criticism. Smith believed that all megalithic phenomena, be it in Northwestern Europe, India, Japan or Mesoamerica, originated in ancient Egypt. "Small groups of people, moving mainly by sea, settled at certain places and there made rude imitations of the Egyptian monuments of the Pyramid Age." (Smith 1911, ix). Smith believed in a direct diffusion to Syria, Crete, East Africa, Southern Arabia and Sumer, while other areas were influenced by secondary diffusion. The neolithic culture of Europe was derived from Egypt as well, according to Smith. The concept of hyperdiffusionism is now referred to by more neutral terms (when referring to the Americas) such as Pre-Columbian trans-oceanic contact.

Egypt

Egypt held a fortunate geographical position that made contacts to western Asia and the Mediterranean possible, while being safe from invasions. The fertile soil led to ample leisure, in art and the crafts could be cultivated. Smith believed that agriculture did originate in Egypt, and only later spread to Mesopotamia. "The earliest cultivators of the soil in Egypt were in fact laying the foundations not merely of agriculture and irrigation but of all the arts and craft, the social organization and religious beliefs which became an integral part of the civilization that was being built up sixty centuries ago and in later ages was diffused throughout the world. (Smith 1911, 6)."

Artificial irrigation led to cooperation and the development of a central government that was based on professional knowledge, a rule of hydraulic engineers. The prosperity of everybody depended on a successful administration and a strong central government (cf. Wittfogel's hydraulic hypothesis). Later on, the leading engineer became a sacred king (cf. Henri Frankfort) and a god (Osiris) after death. Ritual and magic formed the germs of the first sciences, of biology and physics. The building of tombs initiated the development of architecture.

Other inventions of the Egyptians were:

  • Weaving
  • Metal working (gold and copper)
  • A calendar
  • Seagoing ships
  • The "art of shaving"
  • Wigs
  • Hats
  • Pillows

The invention of metallurgy was the most important, as it quickened the pace of invention, widened the scope of human endeavour, stimulated the advancement of arts and crafts and awakened courage and the spirit of great adventure. The search for copper was to become the most important factor in the universal spread of civilisation. Prospectors settled in foreign countries and introduced agriculture, burial customs and their religion as well.

At first, Smith remained vague on the reasons for the spread of Egyptian influence to places without mineral deposits like Polynesia. But in 1915 William James Perry, professor of comparative religion at the university of Manchester advanced the view that the "megalith-builders" were looking for pearls and precious stones, which Smith adopted as well.

Smith did not believe that this spread of culture was necessarily connected to a certain race, in contrast to other diffusionists like the German prehistorian Gustaf Kossinna. While he saw a racial affinity between the Egyptians and the first agriculturalists of southern Europe, both being of the "brown race", the spread of civilisation was mainly a spread of ideas, not of tribes or people.

History

In the age of Colonialism, hyperdiffusionism proved attractive, as it showed how missionaries, engineers and prospectors had spread civilisation all over the earth, as the colonial nations believed to do themselves.

Later on, hyperdiffusionism supplied a single, simple explanation of the complex process of neolithisation that made it attractive to amateur archaeologists worldwide. It could be used to retain a Eurocentric view on history in the face of increasing evidence for impressive autochthonous development, for example in Zimbabwe (Great Zimbabwe), Polynesia (Easter Island) and Micronesia (Nan Madol on the island of Pohnpei).

In present times it is widely believe today that the megalithic graves of Britain, Ireland, France, Portugal, the Netherlands, Denmark, northern Germany, and Poland are much earlier than the Egyptian pyramids, while the Mesoamerican pyramids are much later and securely based in a local development.

Private Life

G. E. Smith's father had migrated to New South Wales from London. He had attended a workingman's college under John Ruskin and later became teacher and headmaster in Grafton, New South Wales. His older brother (S. H. Smith) was Director of Education in New South Wales, his younger brother (S. A. Smith) acting professor for anatomy at the university of Sydney. Smith himself was educated at Sydney Boys High.

G. E. Smith married Kathleen Macredie in 1902. During his time in London, he lived in Hampstead, Gower Street, and at Regent's Park. During his London years, he became a friend of Dr. W. H. R. Rivers.

Smith's youngest son, Stephen Smith, died in an accident in 1936 and G.E Smith spent his final year in a nursing home in London, where he died.

Bibliography

Warren Dawson's list of Smith's publications includes 434 publications. Among the most important are:

  • The Natural Subdivision of the Cerebral Hemisphere (1901).
  • The Primary Subdivisions of the Mammalian Cerebellum (1902).
  • The Ancient Egyptians and the origin of Civilization (London/New York, Harper & Brother 1911).
  • Catalogue of the Royal Mummies in the Museum of Cairo (Cairo 1912).
  • On the Significance of the geographical distribution of Mummification - a study of the migrations of peoples and the spread of certain customs and beliefs (1916).
  • The Evolution of the Dragon (1919). (Project Gutenberg copy of book)
  • Evolution of the Dragon at sacred-texts.com
  • Tutankhamen and the Discovery of his Tomb (1923).
  • Evolution of Man: Essays (1924, 2nd edition 1927).
  • Human History (1930).
  • The Diffusion of Culture (London, Watts 1933).
  • Elephants and Ethnologists.[8]
  • Serle, Percival (1949). "Smith, Grafton Elliot". Dictionary of Australian Biography. Sydney: Angus & Robertson.
  • A. P. Elkin/N. W. G. Macintosh, Grafton Elliot Smith, The Man and his Work (Sydney University Press 1974).
  • W. R. Dawson, Sir Grafton Elliot Smith: a Biographical Record by his Colleagues (London, Cape 1938).

References

  1. ^ a b c Attention: This template ({{cite doi}}) is deprecated. To cite the publication identified by doi:10.1098/rsbm.1938.0014, please use {{cite journal}} (if it was published in a bona fide academic journal, otherwise {{cite report}} with |doi=10.1098/rsbm.1938.0014 instead.
  2. ^ http://www.shsobu.org.au/wp-content/uploads/imperial-honours.pdf
  3. ^ Macmillan, Malcolm (2009). "Evolution and the neurosciences down-under". Journal of the history of the neurosciences. 18 (2). England: 150–96. doi:10.1080/09647040701662377. PMID 19367486. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help); Cite has empty unknown parameters: |laysummary=, |laydate=, |month=, and |laysource= (help)CS1 maint: year (link)
  4. ^ Handbook of paleoanthropology, volume 1, Winfriend Henke, Thorolf Hardt, p. 31
  5. ^ Archeological theory, who sets the agenda? Norman Yoffee, Andrew Sherratt, p. 47
  6. ^ Ian Shaw A Dictionary of Archaeology 2002, p. 200
  7. ^ Studying human origins, disciplinary history and epistemology, Raymond Corbey, Wil Roebroeks, p. 51
  8. ^ Xquic#Comparative religion
Academic offices
Preceded by Fullerian Professor of Physiology
1933 – 1935
Succeeded by

Template:Persondata