Talk:Economic history of Argentina/GA1: Difference between revisions
→GA Review: starting to build Initial comments |
expanding |
||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
I, quite happy for the nominator and/or other editors to post comments, questions, etc. If they relate to a particular section of the review, I'm happy for them to immediately follow my comments. [[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] ([[User talk:Pyrotec|talk]]) 16:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
I, quite happy for the nominator and/or other editors to post comments, questions, etc. If they relate to a particular section of the review, I'm happy for them to immediately follow my comments. [[User:Pyrotec|Pyrotec]] ([[User talk:Pyrotec|talk]]) 16:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
* '''Post-independence transition''' - |
Revision as of 16:13, 16 June 2012
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk · contribs) 14:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
- I will review. Pyrotec (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2012 (UTC)
Initial comments
This article has been sitting around for a long time at WP:GAN (in round figures, five months), and its also quite a long article, so for these two reasons I decided to review it.
I think that this article could make GA-status this time time. On the plus side, it appears to be comprehensive (its long); it's well illustrated and well referenced. On the minus side, I don't believe that the WP:Lead is compliant (in addition, its not easy to read); and I don't like the Colonial economy section, most of that was stating what Argentina was not. I would have expected an encyclopaedia, and that is what wikipedia is, to state what a "thing" is, not what a "thing" is not. On that basis, not not going to "quick fail" this article: I will review it.
I'm now start a full review of this article, section by section. I normally leave the WP:Lead until last and I will do the same here. However, in this review I'm going to start at the Post-independence transition section, work my way to the end, then do Colonial economy and then the Lead.
As this is a long article, this part of the review is likely to take me several days.
I, quite happy for the nominator and/or other editors to post comments, questions, etc. If they relate to a particular section of the review, I'm happy for them to immediately follow my comments. Pyrotec (talk) 16:12, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- Post-independence transition -