Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division of Clinical Neuropsychology: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion page for Division of Clinical Neuropsychology. (TW) |
|||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division of Clinical Neuropsychology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 20#{{anchorencode:Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Division_of_Clinical_Neuropsychology Stats]</span>) |
:{{la|Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Division of Clinical Neuropsychology|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 June 20#{{anchorencode:Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{•}} <span class="plainlinks">[http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Division_of_Clinical_Neuropsychology Stats]</span>) |
||
:({{Find sources|Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}}) |
:({{Find sources|Division of Clinical Neuropsychology}}) |
||
DePRODed without addressing the notability issues (unreferenced, no reliable sources). As a small division (only 4,000 members) of a larger organisation , it does not credibly assert notability for a stan-alone article. May be possible to merge it to the parent article. [[User:Kudpung|Kudpung กุดผึ้ง]] ([[User talk:Kudpung|talk]]) 10:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:05, 20 June 2012
- Division of Clinical Neuropsychology (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DePRODed without addressing the notability issues (unreferenced, no reliable sources). As a small division (only 4,000 members) of a larger organisation , it does not credibly assert notability for a stan-alone article. May be possible to merge it to the parent article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:03, 20 June 2012 (UTC)