Talk:HMS Exeter (68): Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 124.170.103.255 - "→Aircraft Catapults: new section" |
|||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
1) Exeter carried two aircraft catapults throughout her career, that is both before and after her 1940 refit, as can be seen in period photos (and on her wreck). I have changed accordingly under ‘General Characteristics’. |
1) Exeter carried two aircraft catapults throughout her career, that is both before and after her 1940 refit, as can be seen in period photos (and on her wreck). I have changed accordingly under ‘General Characteristics’. |
||
On this note a correction is also needed to the statement under ‘Modifications’ that post Graf Spee modifications included ''“A larger catapult arrangement and cranes were fitted for handling the Walrus amphibious aircraft.”'' At the time of her loss Exeter carried only one crane (not cranes), and while the catapults may - and I repeat only ‘may’ - have been modified post Graf Spee, catapults capable of carrying the Walrus aircraft had already been fitted pre the Graf Spee engagement, |
On this note a correction is also needed to the statement under ‘Modifications’ that post Graf Spee modifications included ''“A larger catapult arrangement and cranes were fitted for handling the Walrus amphibious aircraft.”'' At the time of her loss Exeter carried only one crane (not cranes), and while the catapults may - and I repeat only ‘may’ - have been modified post Graf Spee, catapults and crane capable of carrying the Walrus aircraft had already been fitted pre the Graf Spee engagement, possibly during her 1936 refit. There are definately photos of her carrying 2 Walrus aircraft dated prior to her 1940 refit. |
||
I also changed the Walrus link destination (by adding the word 'Supermarine'), as the 'Walrus' link actually took you to the walrus animal page! |
I also changed the Walrus link destination (by adding the word 'Supermarine'), as the 'Walrus' link actually took you to the walrus animal page! |
Revision as of 01:14, 24 June 2012
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the HMS Exeter (68) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Untitled
According to the reference I put in and the web site, the ship sank and was not scuttled. This event also took place on 1 March 1942 after theBattle of the Java Sea the day before.
Cheers
WRONG
there were EIGHT hits on exeter
x
I dont think it was part of the 'County ' class at all
While there were a few sub classes of the County class, Exeter( And York) were not amoung them. The names alone are not 'counties'- then again London wasnt either- but the dimensions , armament and so on are all different.
- Yeah, not County class. Exeter and York were cut down, cheaper derivatives, though. Two built of five planned. My ref calls them Exeter class, with differing bridge and funnel profiles. By the way, London was an English county for many years until the early-1970s, when it was superseded by 'Greater London'. Folks at 137 15:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
- Checked further. The wiki article County class cruiser includes the York sub-class and contrasts with other County cruisers. But you're right: there were significant differences. Folks at 137 18:17, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Aircraft on Exeter
I have just completed a restoration of a photo album belonging to a sailor from the HMS Exeter who recently passed away. The photographs were taken whilst the Exeter was on tour during 1936-1939.
The photographs are in good condition and would enhance your article. In fact they contradict the statement that only one aircraft was carried on board at a time. Photographs clearly show the ships two aircraft stored on board and also launching and recovery practice undertaken with both aircraft.
The photographs were taken by the ships photographer on board.
I have no idea how to add a photo here or amend your article, obviously I need your permission.
--Sarkyart (talk) 18:47, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- That would be very helpful, have a look at Wikipedia:Uploading images which will give you some advice as to how to upload images, and feel free to ask me if you have further questions. You are right that for a period two aircraft were carried. Port and starboard catapults with an aircraft each were installed 4-5 months after Exeter had been completed, but one of the catapults and presumably its aircraft was removed prior to the outbreak of war. Benea (talk) 20:01, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
Aircraft Catapults
1) Exeter carried two aircraft catapults throughout her career, that is both before and after her 1940 refit, as can be seen in period photos (and on her wreck). I have changed accordingly under ‘General Characteristics’.
On this note a correction is also needed to the statement under ‘Modifications’ that post Graf Spee modifications included “A larger catapult arrangement and cranes were fitted for handling the Walrus amphibious aircraft.” At the time of her loss Exeter carried only one crane (not cranes), and while the catapults may - and I repeat only ‘may’ - have been modified post Graf Spee, catapults and crane capable of carrying the Walrus aircraft had already been fitted pre the Graf Spee engagement, possibly during her 1936 refit. There are definately photos of her carrying 2 Walrus aircraft dated prior to her 1940 refit.
I also changed the Walrus link destination (by adding the word 'Supermarine'), as the 'Walrus' link actually took you to the walrus animal page!
2) Although tubs (enclosures) were fitted atop B and Y Turrets to carry a 20mm Oerlikon, the guns themselves were never fitted.
3) Exeter was hit by two torpodoes (as claimed by Inazuma and evidenced on the wreck) not one. Hence I have also changed accordingly under ‘Fate’. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.170.103.255 (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- All unassessed articles
- B-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- B-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- B-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- B-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- B-Class Shipwreck articles
- Unknown-importance Shipwreck articles