User talk:Castlemate: Difference between revisions
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
===Comment=== |
===Comment=== |
||
You do have the right to make your personal "keep" argument in that discussion. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.73.246|202.124.73.246]] ([[User talk:202.124.73.246|talk]]) 13:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC) |
You do have the right to make your personal "keep" argument in that discussion, you know. I suggest that you do. -- [[Special:Contributions/202.124.73.246|202.124.73.246]] ([[User talk:202.124.73.246|talk]]) 13:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC) |
||
== Talk page etiquette == |
== Talk page etiquette == |
Revision as of 13:25, 30 June 2012
You have a barnstar! :D
The Original Barnstar | ||
Hi Castlemate! I wish to award you this barnstar for your recent work on Frank Tidswell and your contributions to Wikipedia as a whole, which have not gone unnoticed. benzband (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
- Hello. You have a new message at Benzband's talk page.
- (^___^) benzband (talk) 13:33, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Crusader Union of Australia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Crusader Union of Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crusader Union of Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 17:08, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment
Please join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Crusader Union of Australia. You may wish to update the article to include coverage in Christianity Today Australia and in this book, as well as newspaper coverage going back to 1933, 1950, and 1952. -- 202.124.73.125 (talk) 13:48, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Also this book. -- 202.124.73.125 (talk) 13:53, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Comment
You do have the right to make your personal "keep" argument in that discussion, you know. I suggest that you do. -- 202.124.73.246 (talk) 13:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Talk page etiquette
GO AWAY! I HAVE ASKED YOU MULTIPLE TIMES. I DO NOT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH YOU. STOP HARASSING ME. 60.242.91.165 (talk) 09:51, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi there, just a request not to keep re-inserting comments on others' talk pages. Other editors are free to remove your comments that you place on their talk page (conventionally, doing so signals that your message has been read.) You can't insist that they keep your messages visible on their talk page if they don't want to do so. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 11:18, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
- In fact I've just noticed that you reinserted the same material three times in less than 24 hours. Strictly speaking that's a violation of WP:3RR and a blockable offence - but I trust that with this advice it won't recur again so I'm not going to block right now. Please be more circumspect in future though. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 11:22, 25 June 2012 (UTC)