Jump to content

Maurice Duplessis: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverting possible vandalism by 173.231.120.42 to version by Jijilola. False positive? Report it. Thanks, ClueBot NG. (1094713) (Bot)
Line 52: Line 52:
{{cite check|section|date=November 2011|talk=Death and legacy}}
{{cite check|section|date=November 2011|talk=Death and legacy}}
{{POV-check|section|Death and legacy|date=November 2011}}
{{POV-check|section|Death and legacy|date=November 2011}}
[[File:Pierre placée lors de l'inauguration de l’Hôpital Reine Elizabeth par Maurice Duplessis.jpg|thumb|right|Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Montréal August 1959]]Duplessis died in office in [[Schefferville, Quebec]], on September 7, 1959, after suffering multiple cerebral seizures. After his death, Quebec society was caught in the [[Quiet Revolution]] (''Révolution tranquille''), a swift socio-cultural change away from his conservative policies toward a highly secular, socially liberal [[welfare state]]. Many of these major changes occurred when the Liberals regained power in 1960 under [[Jean Lesage]].
[[File:Pierre placée lors de l'inauguration de l’Hôpital Reine Elizabeth par Maurice Duplessis.jpg|thumb|right|Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Montréal August 1959]]Duplessis died in office in [[Schefferville, Quebec]], on September 7, 1959, after suffering multiple cerebral seizures. Following his death and the subsequent election of a Liberal government under [[Jean Lesage]] in 1960, Quebec entered a period later termed the [[Quiet Revolution]] (''Révolution tranquille''), a decisive movement away from the conservative policies of Duplessis and toward a secular [[social democracy]].

Most of his surviving relatives have not handed down the "Duplessis" name to their children, although one of his nieces, Berthe Brunet-Dufresne, has taken it upon herself to rehabilitate her uncle.{{Citation needed|date=February 2009}}


Duplessis has not been without his defenders. [[Conrad Black]]'s 1977 [[encomium]], ''Duplessis'', painted a sympathetic portrait of the man as a transitional figure towards modernism, and the victim of partisan attack and personal malady (Black revealed, for instance, that Duplessis suffered from [[hypospadias]]).<ref>Conrad Black, ''Duplessis'', (McLelland & Stewart, 1977)</ref>
Duplessis has not been without his defenders. [[Conrad Black]]'s 1977 [[encomium]], ''Duplessis'', painted a sympathetic portrait of the man as a transitional figure towards modernism, and the victim of partisan attack and personal malady (Black revealed, for instance, that Duplessis suffered from [[hypospadias]]).<ref>Conrad Black, ''Duplessis'', (McLelland & Stewart, 1977)</ref>


Nevertheless, Duplessis's legacy has been the subject of repeated criticism in the decades since his death. Quebec nationalists dislike his anti-separatist stance, liberals denounce his social conservatism, while some minorities resent the privileges granted the Catholic church over other religious groups {{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} His critics hold that Duplessis's inherently-corrupt patronage politics, his reactionary conservatism, his emphasis on traditional family and religious values, his anachronistic anti-union stance, rural focus and his preservation and promotion of Catholic Church institutions over the development of a secular social infrastructure underway in most of the postwar West, stunted Quebec's social and economic development by at least a decade.
Duplessis's legacy has remained under attack throughout the decades from all sides. The leftist Quebec nationalists disliked both his social conservatism and anti-separatist tendencies, the Liberals disliked his era as a period of successful patronage-oriented traditional conservatism and family values, and the conservatives among the Quebec Anglophones have disliked the privileges given to the church and the lack of freedoms for other churches (Protestant etc.). {{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}

In response, it has been argued that the notion of the Duplessis "black years" is a myth propagated by all subsequent major political actors in Quebec to Catholic church-oriented traditionalist patterns of development, with dominant intellectual movements combining various elements of this dislike. However, the counter-argument, that this is an over-simplification which fails to capture the complexities of Quebec politics, society and its economy, has consistently prevailed in public and academic discourse for some time.

Aside from occasional defenders of his anti-Communist and socially conservative views <ref>{{Cite book |editor-last=Richardson |editor-first=James T. |title=Regulating religion: case studies from around the globe legacy |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=U6opyVE_IYkC&pg=PA425 |page=425 |chapter=Public Management of Religious Diversity in Canada |first=Pauline |last=Côté |publisher=Springer |year=2004}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |first=Catherine |last=Frost |title=Morality and nationalism |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=47yd5avJPYUC&pg=PA157 |page=157 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2006}}</ref>, defence of the Duplessis regime today comes primarily from traditionalist conservatives ([[paleoconservatives]] in North American definition) who view his regime as an essential reaffirmation of traditional values, and as assertion by democratic means of the basics of church and family life with low social spending and suppression of labour unions.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}} Duplessis is thereby held to have prevented "subversion" without the massive use of force and police repression that characterized the dictatorial policies of the [[Franco]] regime in [[Spain]] (which he supported).{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}

The [[Canadian Historical Association]] in a booklet on file with [[Collections Canada]] puts it this way:

::"The Duplessis regime may well have endured for too long, the Union Nationale leader's traditionalist policies may well have been anachronistic when compared with the relatively modern society that, in many respects, the Quebec of the 1950s had already become.<ref>{{Cite book |first=Richard |last=Jones |title=Duplessis and the Union National [sic] Administration| url=http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/008004/f2/H-35_en.pdf| page=17 |publisher=The Canadian Historical Association|year=1983}}</ref>"

For better or worse, Duplessis leant stability to Quebec through turbulent times. For this he is praised by some and reviled by others. Few Quebecois view him favourably in public dicourse today, but he devoted much of his life to public office and was sufficiently popular with the Quebec electorate of the period to spend almost two decades as Premier, a position he held until his death.


His historical legacy, for better or worse, is that this performance lends faint hope to those who seek to "stand athwart history, yelling Stop! ([[William F. Buckley, Jr.]])" or otherwise impede the inexorable march of civilization; who seek to preserve individual and institutional privilege over the common good; who separate the world into friends and enemies, haves and have-nots, us and them. Who prefer myth over fact, faith to science, and indolence to industry. His legacy is that he showed it was possible to convince enough people that what was bad for everybody was was good for them personally to actually get elected to the highest office in Quebec - four times.
The myth of the "black years" of Duplessis and Duplessis's legacy has thus emerged as a result of intellectual opposition by all major Quebec political currents to Catholic church-oriented traditionalist patterns of development, with dominant intellectual streaks combining elements of this dislike. Aside from occasional defenders of his anti-Communist and socially conservative views <ref>{{Cite book |editor-last=Richardson |editor-first=James T. |title=Regulating religion: case studies from around the globe legacy |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=U6opyVE_IYkC&pg=PA425 |page=425 |chapter=Public Management of Religious Diversity in Canada |first=Pauline |last=Côté |publisher=Springer |year=2004}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |first=Catherine |last=Frost |title=Morality and nationalism |url=http://books.google.com/books?id=47yd5avJPYUC&pg=PA157 |page=157 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2006}}</ref> (like Conrad Black), the only defenders of Duplessis regime today come from traditionalist conservatives ([[paleoconservatives]] in North American definition) who view his regime as an essential reaffirmation of traditional values, and as assertion by democratic means of the basics of church and family life with low social spending and suppression of labour unions.{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}


Some people think that's a good thing. Some don't.
The Duplessis regime thus claimed to have prevented "subversion" without the massive use of force and police repression that characterized the dictatorial policies of the [[Franco]] regime in [[Spain]] (which Duplessis supported).{{Citation needed|date=September 2010}}


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 08:57, 1 July 2012

Maurice Duplessis
Duplessis campaigning in the 1952 election.
16th Premier of Quebec
In office
August 17, 1936 – October 25, 1939
Preceded byAdélard Godbout
Succeeded byAdélard Godbout
In office
August 8, 1944 – September 7, 1959
Preceded byAdélard Godbout
Succeeded byPaul Sauvé
Personal details
Born
Maurice Le Noblet Duplessis

(1890-04-20)April 20, 1890
Trois-Rivières, Quebec
DiedSeptember 7, 1959(1959-09-07) (aged 69)
Schefferville, Quebec
Political partyUnion Nationale
ProfessionLawyer

Maurice Le Noblet Duplessis (French pronunciation: [dzyplɛsi]; 20 April 1890 – 7 September 1959) served as the 16th Premier of the Canadian province of Quebec from 1936 to 1939 and 1944 to 1959. A founder and leader of the highly conservative Union Nationale party, he rose to power after exposing the misconduct and patronage of Liberal Premier Louis-Alexandre Taschereau. [1]

His reign is often referred to in Quebec as La grande noirceur ("The Great Darkness"), especially due to the prevalent corruption and for the scandal surrounding the Duplessis Orphans. During the time, the Liberal opposition was unsuccessful in challenging Duplessis' power. Duplessis championed rural areas, provincial rights, anti-Communism and opposed the trade unions.

Early life

Born in Trois-Rivières and son of local politician Nérée Le Noblet Duplessis, Duplessis studied at the Séminaire Saint-Joseph de Trois-Rivières, obtained a law degree from Université Laval's Montréal branch (later renamed Université de Montréal) and was admitted to the Barreau du Quebec in 1913. He returned to his home town to practice law until running for public office. He was a life-long bachelor.

Political career

Duplessis in 1936
Maurice Duplessis sculpture in front of Parliament Building (Quebec)

Duplessis first won a seat as a Conservative Party of Quebec candidate in the 1927 Quebec election. In the 1931 election, he was reelected in his seat, but Conservative leader Camillien Houde lost both the election and his own seat. The Conservative caucus chose C. E. Gault to be interim Leader of the Opposition but, after Houde resigned as party leader in 1932, Duplessis won the leadership of the party during the 1933 convention over the only other candidate, Onésime Gagnon.

Two weeks before the 1935 provincial election, he engineered a coalition with Paul Gouin's Action libérale nationale (ALN), a party of dissident reform Liberals and nationalists who had quit the governing Parti libéral du Québec. While he lost that election, Duplessis was soon able to exploit a patronage scandal involving the family of Premier Louis-Alexandre Taschereau to force Taschereau's resignation.

Gouin withdrew his support from Duplessis on June 18, 1936, but the ALN caucus sided with Duplessis and joined with his Conservative caucus to formally merge into the Union Nationale party. Duplessis and the UN won the August 1936 election in a landslide, putting an end to thirty-nine consecutive years of Liberal rule. Duplessis's first government was defeated in the 1939 election, a snap election called by the premier in hopes of exploiting the issue of Canadian participation in World War II.

Duplessis returned as premier in the 1944 election, and held power without serious opposition for the next fifteen years, until his death, winning elections in 1948, 1952 and 1956. He became known simply as le Chef ("the boss").

He was elected to five terms of office in all, the last four of them consecutive. Duplessis remains the last Quebec premier to have won three or more consecutive majority governments. After him, no political party in Quebec elections at the provincial level had managed to win more than two terms of office in a row until the December 2008 victory of Jean Charest's Liberal party, its third consecutive win.

Policies

Duplessis favoured rural areas over city development and introduced various agricultural credits during his first term. He was also noted for meagre investment in social services. Duplessis also opposed military conscription and Canadian involvement in World War II. The Union Nationale often had the active support of the Roman Catholic Church in its political campaigns and employed the slogan Le ciel est bleu; l'enfer est rouge: Heaven is blue (UN); Hell is red (Liberal).[2]

Roncarelli v. Duplessis

Duplessis actively opposed Jehovah's Witnesses and once used his influence to revoke a liquor license from one of their member's businesses. This decision was overturned by the Supreme Court of Canada, Duplessis being ordered to pay $33,123.53 in damages. He died shortly thereafter.

Death and legacy

Queen Elisabeth Hospital, Montréal August 1959

Duplessis died in office in Schefferville, Quebec, on September 7, 1959, after suffering multiple cerebral seizures. Following his death and the subsequent election of a Liberal government under Jean Lesage in 1960, Quebec entered a period later termed the Quiet Revolution (Révolution tranquille), a decisive movement away from the conservative policies of Duplessis and toward a secular social democracy.

Duplessis has not been without his defenders. Conrad Black's 1977 encomium, Duplessis, painted a sympathetic portrait of the man as a transitional figure towards modernism, and the victim of partisan attack and personal malady (Black revealed, for instance, that Duplessis suffered from hypospadias).[3]

Nevertheless, Duplessis's legacy has been the subject of repeated criticism in the decades since his death. Quebec nationalists dislike his anti-separatist stance, liberals denounce his social conservatism, while some minorities resent the privileges granted the Catholic church over other religious groups [citation needed] His critics hold that Duplessis's inherently-corrupt patronage politics, his reactionary conservatism, his emphasis on traditional family and religious values, his anachronistic anti-union stance, rural focus and his preservation and promotion of Catholic Church institutions over the development of a secular social infrastructure underway in most of the postwar West, stunted Quebec's social and economic development by at least a decade.

In response, it has been argued that the notion of the Duplessis "black years" is a myth propagated by all subsequent major political actors in Quebec to Catholic church-oriented traditionalist patterns of development, with dominant intellectual movements combining various elements of this dislike. However, the counter-argument, that this is an over-simplification which fails to capture the complexities of Quebec politics, society and its economy, has consistently prevailed in public and academic discourse for some time.

Aside from occasional defenders of his anti-Communist and socially conservative views [4][5], defence of the Duplessis regime today comes primarily from traditionalist conservatives (paleoconservatives in North American definition) who view his regime as an essential reaffirmation of traditional values, and as assertion by democratic means of the basics of church and family life with low social spending and suppression of labour unions.[citation needed] Duplessis is thereby held to have prevented "subversion" without the massive use of force and police repression that characterized the dictatorial policies of the Franco regime in Spain (which he supported).[citation needed]

The Canadian Historical Association in a booklet on file with Collections Canada puts it this way:

"The Duplessis regime may well have endured for too long, the Union Nationale leader's traditionalist policies may well have been anachronistic when compared with the relatively modern society that, in many respects, the Quebec of the 1950s had already become.[6]"

For better or worse, Duplessis leant stability to Quebec through turbulent times. For this he is praised by some and reviled by others. Few Quebecois view him favourably in public dicourse today, but he devoted much of his life to public office and was sufficiently popular with the Quebec electorate of the period to spend almost two decades as Premier, a position he held until his death.

His historical legacy, for better or worse, is that this performance lends faint hope to those who seek to "stand athwart history, yelling Stop! (William F. Buckley, Jr.)" or otherwise impede the inexorable march of civilization; who seek to preserve individual and institutional privilege over the common good; who separate the world into friends and enemies, haves and have-nots, us and them. Who prefer myth over fact, faith to science, and indolence to industry. His legacy is that he showed it was possible to convince enough people that what was bad for everybody was was good for them personally to actually get elected to the highest office in Quebec - four times.

Some people think that's a good thing. Some don't.

See also

References

  1. ^ Black, Conrad M. (2011). "Duplessis, Maurice Le Noblet". Canadian Encyclopedia, Historica Foundation, Toronto. Retrieved January 31, 2011.
  2. ^ Verna, Gérard (2006). "Le fait religieux au Canada" (in French). Université Laval. Retrieved July 7, 2011.
  3. ^ Conrad Black, Duplessis, (McLelland & Stewart, 1977)
  4. ^ Côté, Pauline (2004). "Public Management of Religious Diversity in Canada". In Richardson, James T. (ed.). Regulating religion: case studies from around the globe legacy. Springer. p. 425.
  5. ^ Frost, Catherine (2006). Morality and nationalism. Taylor & Francis. p. 157.
  6. ^ Jones, Richard (1983). Duplessis and the Union National [sic] Administration (PDF). The Canadian Historical Association. p. 17.

Reference works

  • Conrad Black, Duplessis, ISBN 0-7710-1530-5, McClelland & Stewart, Toronto, 1977.
  • Jacques Rouillard, Le syndicalisme Québécois, Boreal, Montreal, 2004
  • CSN-CSQ, Histoire du mouvement ouvrier au Quebec, 2001
  • Jones, R. (1983). Duplessis and the union nationale administration. Ottawa: Canadian Historical Association.
  • Laporte, P. (1960). The true face of duplessis. Montreal: Harvest House Limited.
  • Paulin, M. (2002). Maurice duplessis: Powerbroker, politician. Montreal: XYZ Publishing.
National Assembly of Quebec
Preceded by MLA, District of Trois-Rivières
1927–1959
Succeeded by
Government offices
Preceded by Premier of Quebec
1936-1939
Succeeded by
Preceded by Premier of Quebec
1944-1959
Succeeded by
Party political offices
Preceded by Leader of the Quebec Conservative Party
1933-1936*
Succeeded by
none
Preceded by
none
Leader of the Union Nationale
1935-1959
Succeeded by
Political offices
Preceded by Leader of the Opposition in Quebec
1932-1936
Succeeded by
Preceded by Leader of the Opposition in Quebec
1939-1944
Succeeded by

*The Union Nationale was founded as an alliance in 1935 with Duplessis as leader. In 1936 the UN formally became a unitary political party with the Quebec Conservative Party dissolving into it.

Template:Persondata