Talk:Stephen (honorific): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Factual accuracy alternatively POV== |
==Factual accuracy alternatively POV== |
||
I would like to see credible and independent sources used to corroborate that the medieval title in question would have been native to the Nemanjic dynasty. In its current state the article is completely unreferenced and alludes to the title as Serbian in origin, which is highly unlikely considering for example that the title was used by Hungarian regents hundreds of years prior to the emergence of the Nemanjic dynasty; see [[Stephen I of Hungary]]. [[User:Praxis Icosahedron|Praxis Icosahedron]] ([[User talk:Praxis Icosahedron|talk]]) 03:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC) |
I would like to see credible and independent sources used to corroborate that the medieval title in question would have been native to the Nemanjic dynasty. In its current state the article is completely unreferenced and alludes to the title as Serbian in origin, which is highly unlikely considering for example that the title was used by Hungarian regents hundreds of years prior to the emergence of the Nemanjic dynasty; see [[Stephen I of Hungary]]. [[User:Praxis Icosahedron|Praxis Icosahedron]] ([[User talk:Praxis Icosahedron|talk]]) 03:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
: See also the list of royalties bearing the title provided in the article on [[Stephen]]: [[Stephen#Royalty]]. There is a bunch of non-Serb rulers; if anything "Stefan" is merely a Serb spelling/variant of the title Stephen, which is also what the article should be renamed to. [[User:Praxis Icosahedron|Praxis Icosahedron]] ([[User talk:Praxis Icosahedron|talk]]) 03:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:45, 8 July 2012
Serbia Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
i think this article should be about a name "Stefan" in general, not about serbian rulers...
Factual accuracy alternatively POV
I would like to see credible and independent sources used to corroborate that the medieval title in question would have been native to the Nemanjic dynasty. In its current state the article is completely unreferenced and alludes to the title as Serbian in origin, which is highly unlikely considering for example that the title was used by Hungarian regents hundreds of years prior to the emergence of the Nemanjic dynasty; see Stephen I of Hungary. Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 03:35, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- See also the list of royalties bearing the title provided in the article on Stephen: Stephen#Royalty. There is a bunch of non-Serb rulers; if anything "Stefan" is merely a Serb spelling/variant of the title Stephen, which is also what the article should be renamed to. Praxis Icosahedron (talk) 03:45, 8 July 2012 (UTC)