Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikitam331: Difference between revisions
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Comments by other users</span>====== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
⚫ | |||
Checkusers will not connect a named account with an IP. If there are other registered socks you believe belong to Wikitam, feel free to post them. Otherwise this will most likely be declined. Regards, <font color="green">[[User:MacMed|'''MacMed''']]</font><sup><font color="red">[[User talk:MacMed|talk]]</font></sup><sub><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/MacMed|stalk]]</font></sub> 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
Checkusers will not connect a named account with an IP. If there are other registered socks you believe belong to Wikitam, feel free to post them. Otherwise this will most likely be declined. Regards, <font color="green">[[User:MacMed|'''MacMed''']]</font><sup><font color="red">[[User talk:MacMed|talk]]</font></sup><sub><font color="black">[[Special:Contributions/MacMed|stalk]]</font></sub> 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== |
Revision as of 05:42, 9 July 2012
– An SPI clerk has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
Wikitam331
Wikitam331 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Populated account categories: suspected
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wikitam331/Archive.
02 July 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
These three users have been active in a move debate at Talk:Reformations. Editing histories of all three users have been very similar (see their user contributions). Both IP addresses appear to be located in the same city. The suspicion arises that these are all the same person. 202.124.72.94 (talk) 13:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Checkusers will not connect named accounts to IPs, and as such the CU request will probably be declined unless there are other registered users you believe are socks. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 16:40, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Clerk declined - Checkusers cannot disclose any connection between named accounts and IP addresses, so any determination will have to be made on behavioral evidence. —DoRD (talk) 17:10, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.
03 July 2012
- Suspected sockpuppets
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
All three accounts actively engaged in requested move discussion at Talk:Reformations. The two IPs have a pattern of editing that is very similar to that of Wikitam331. The three sometimes refers to edits made by the others in a way that suggests they may be one and the same. For example, at 02:31, 3 July 2012, 76.125.166.228 made this edit apparently referring to this edit by Wikitam331 made only a moment earlier. While I have no problem with editors who might forget to login, in this case the three have each !voted in the move discussion. older ≠ wiser 17:54, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
Checkusers will not connect a named account with an IP. If there are other registered socks you believe belong to Wikitam, feel free to post them. Otherwise this will most likely be declined. Regards, MacMedtalkstalk 22:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
- The three accounts edit only Reformations and articles linked from it; the two IPs are in the same city; it does seem that all three are the same person. -- 202.124.74.41 (talk) 05:41, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- Per above. WilliamH (talk) 06:48, 4 July 2012 (UTC)