User talk:Jonkulbacki1

Welcome!

Hello, Jonkulbacki1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Jonathon kulbacki, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! BPositive (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathon kulbacki

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jonathon kulbacki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. BPositive (talk) 18:04, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Please do not write an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 18:10, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jonkulbacki1. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 99.153.142.225 (talk) 18:36, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Please stop writing about yourself and your family. Wikipedia is not Facebook. Wikipedia articles are not for posting information about yourself. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Template:Z44 -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:46, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Kelly Kulbacki.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Manway 18:56, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Jonkulbacki1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Camaco lorain manufacturing

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Camaco lorain manufacturing, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.camacollc.com/company.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 02:02, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Camaco lorain manufacturing

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Camaco lorain manufacturing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Thebestofall007 (talk) 02:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard.Template:Z45 -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop creating articles about yourself on Wikipedia. Nobody is reading Wikipedia articles to look for somebody to hire. Instead, please use LinkedIn or some other job hunting service. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 16:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because you have persisted in creating unsuitable articles. It is common for new editors to come to Wikipedia thinking that "anyone can edit Wikipedia" means "anyone can add anything they like to Wikipedia", and it may be that at first you sincerely thought that it was acceptable to use Wikipedia to publish your resume and other articles about yourself and your family. However, your misatake has been pointed out to you many times, and you cannot possibly still be under that impression, yet you continue. You have even made slight changes to the title of an article to try to evade page protection, so it is perfectly clear that you are fully aware that you are acting in ways which are unacceptable. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a social network site or a free advertising service. If believe thee are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jonkulbacki1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I WAS BLOCKED FOR "Persistently creating self-promotional and other unsuitable articles", I HAVE LEARNED MY LESSON AND I REALIZE WHAT I HAVE DONE IS WRONG, I WILL NO LONGER DO THIS, ALSO MY SAND BOX TALK WAS STOLEN AND PUT ON OTHER SITES WHICH WILL HURT ME EX.: http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/User:Jonkulbacki1/sandbox Jonkulbacki1 (talk) 01:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You've got a lot of nerve complaining that somebody copied the spam you posted here and put it on some other website. As is indicated in the notice you see every single time you edit here anything you post can be copied by anyone, for any purpose, and there is nothing we can do about some other website anyway. So, getting back to your actions, which are the only relevant thing here, what type of edits would you be making if unblocked? Please be as specific as possible as you will need to make a convincing case that you are truly done spamming here, and please do not YELL IN ALL CAPS, it does not make your point any stronger, just more annoying. Thanks. Beeblebrox (talk) 16:04, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are aware that all Wikipedia contributions are dual-licensed under CC-By-SA 3.0 and GFDL, correct? This means that once you post something on Wikipedia, anyone can repost it anywhere they like, provided they credit all authors (such as by linking to the page history) and release it under the same licenses. Sites other than Wikipedia are outside our remit. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 05:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

So what are you intending to do if unblocked? Max Semenik (talk) 07:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)