Jump to content

Talk:Character Strengths and Virtues: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
socrates and MLK: new section
Line 4: Line 4:


It has been brought to my attention that the images of Socrates and MLK may seem "barely connected to the topic of the article." I have rewritten the captions to make their relevance more clear. I look forward to all feedback. -[[User:Tesseract2|'''<span style="color:#003153">Tesseract<sup>2</sup></span>''']][[User talk:Tesseract2|(talk)]] 16:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
It has been brought to my attention that the images of Socrates and MLK may seem "barely connected to the topic of the article." I have rewritten the captions to make their relevance more clear. I look forward to all feedback. -[[User:Tesseract2|'''<span style="color:#003153">Tesseract<sup>2</sup></span>''']][[User talk:Tesseract2|(talk)]] 16:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
:That's better. Thanks. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 00:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:52, 20 July 2012

WikiProject iconPhilosophy: Literature / Ethics Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Associated task forces:
Taskforce icon
Philosophical literature
Taskforce icon
Ethics

socrates and MLK

It has been brought to my attention that the images of Socrates and MLK may seem "barely connected to the topic of the article." I have rewritten the captions to make their relevance more clear. I look forward to all feedback. -Tesseract2(talk) 16:41, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's better. Thanks. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 00:52, 20 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]