Talk:California State Route 188: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 05:11, 25 July 2012

California State Route 188 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 26, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: California GA‑class High‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on the project's quality scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Locations	California
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article may or may not contain a junction list. Please check, then add `\|needs-jctint=` to this template accordingly.
	This article does not have a KML file. Please work with the Maps department to create and add a file for this article.

California GA‑class Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
GA	This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

San Diego GA‑class Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject San Diego, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to San Diego and San Diego County on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.San DiegoWikipedia:WikiProject San DiegoTemplate:WikiProject San DiegoSan Diego

GA

This article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject San Diego To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate San Diego related articles from Category:Unassessed San Diego articles and Category:Unknown-importance San Diego articles with the {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner.
Cleanup : A cleanup listing for this project is available: clean-up listing for San_Diego
Expand : San Miguel Mountain, Most articles from Category:Stub-Class San Diego articles.
Photo : Request photos that are needed from Category:Wikipedia requested photographs in San Diego County, California to include in each article.
Stubs : Work on articles in Category:San Diego County, California, geography stubs.
Other : * Add {{WikiProject San Diego}} project banner to related articles' talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get San Diego into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

Map

The map looks better if it's zoomed in more; the highlighted route on the current map looks too short. ^_^ AL2TB ^_^ 04:03, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:California State Route 188/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 17:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
~~See comment section below.~~Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Reference number 1 is not working. Fix it or delete it. I will pass the article once this issue is resolved. Everything else in the article is good.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Fixed; we can thank Microsoft for making a new XLSX format. :/ --Rs chen 7754 17:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article will be on hold for 7 days.--Dom497 (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 18:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 }}
 {{U.S. Roads WikiProject|state=CA|importance=high|class=GA|needs-kml=yes|needs-map=no}}
-{{WikiProject California|class=GA}}
+{{WikiProject California|class=GA|importance=low}}
 {{WikiProject San Diego|class=GA|importance=Low}}