Jump to content

Talk:Draža Mihailović: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Renaming: new section
Line 93: Line 93:
: do you have a reliable source that questions Chetnik responsibility for the massacres? [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User talk:Peacemaker67|talk]]) 14:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
: do you have a reliable source that questions Chetnik responsibility for the massacres? [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User talk:Peacemaker67|talk]]) 14:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
::Why don't you show me the source that blames the Chetniks? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.57.130.3|24.57.130.3]] ([[User talk:24.57.130.3|talk]]) 14:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
::Why don't you show me the source that blames the Chetniks? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/24.57.130.3|24.57.130.3]] ([[User talk:24.57.130.3|talk]]) 14:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Renaming ==

His last name is spelled [[Mihajlovic]] not Mihailovic. Why is it spelled that way? Shouldn't it be renamed to the correct spelling?

Revision as of 20:37, 29 July 2012

Drafts pages

Allegations of torture during trial

I have removed the following sentence:

Mihailović appeared physically and intellectually weakened, possibly by torture.[1] His answers were often incoherent.

The reference provided is a secondary source, which claims torture by referencing the official transcripts of the trial (primary source). These transcripts state quite the opposite. Mr. Mihailovic stated that he was well treated. Moreover, the trial was broadcasted live, and in the presence of 69 journalists - none of which raised any issue in regards to his health or mental state. If he was tortured, he had the means to let the world know.

Mostly, I repeat, the provided source is secondary, pointing to the primary, which attests to exactly the opposite; He was not tortured. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clicker1 (talkcontribs) 15:58, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Changes I made:

  • I removed McDonald (2002) as he does not take sides and simply points out what Tim Judah has said, which is that the authenticity is disputed.
  • I removed Pavlowitch (2005) as it's a book review and since Pavlowitch (2007) is already present.
  • Added Mihailović's view of expelling the Muslims.
  • Rephrased text about Đurišić reporting the massacres of Muslims and added Mihailović's response.

-- ◅PRODUCER (TALK) 11:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Article tags

This article has been tagged for a long time, but there has been little recent discussion here, let alone sufficient to justify the tags. If an interested editor continues to have concerns, could you state them here so that they can be addressed? Thanks. Peacemaker67 (talk) 03:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I've deleted them. If anyone has something to justify them, feel free to raise it here, of course. Peacemaker67 (talk) 11:32, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

there is no realible non-communist reference that say that Draža was collaborator. It is titoist communist propaganda that was invented against ideologic enemy. HuHu22 (talk) 13:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

so you say. Name the sources you say are communist, and produce reliable sources that say they are communist and support your contention that they are unreliable. Peacemaker67 (talk) 13:59, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
no, mister. you produce here sources that say that Draža was collaborator. then I will say are these communist. we have no source here and we are unable to speak about something that no exist. HuHu22 (talk) 14:10, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Peacemaker67 and PRODUCER are revert waring and not discuss changes on talk. HuHu22 (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

There is no proof that the Chetniks were to be blamed for massacres and terrorism and ethnic cleansing or whatever else he is being blamed for! Specifically in #Terror Tactics and Cleansing Actions. Whoever added that simply took one point of view. The Croats and Muslims were blamed by others but who is telling the truth? We don't know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.130.3 (talk) 14:33, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

do you have a reliable source that questions Chetnik responsibility for the massacres? Peacemaker67 (talk) 14:42, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you show me the source that blames the Chetniks? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.57.130.3 (talk) 14:54, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

His last name is spelled Mihajlovic not Mihailovic. Why is it spelled that way? Shouldn't it be renamed to the correct spelling?

  1. ^ Ramet (2006), p 166