User talk:Justanonymous: Difference between revisions
→A brownie for you!: new WikiLove message |
|||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Keep up the good work on the [[Agenda 21]] article! [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]]</small> 14:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC) |
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Keep up the good work on the [[Agenda 21]] article! [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]]<small><span style="font-weight:bold;"> ·</span> [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]]</small> 14:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
|} |
|} |
||
==agenda 21== |
|||
I think you could make a case that since agenda 21 is a popular, or semi popular topic among right wing republicans (for want of a better term - if you want to replace right wing republican with a less charged term, no problem) it seems that a encyclopedia article on agenda 21 would cover how it is percieved (thats basic, right) and in that discussion, the right wing fantasys about the KGB/CIA/rothschild/soros world conspiracy would fit Further, that people seem to be *misquoting* the document is relevant; i agree that it is vague and you could argue that golf courses fit under unsustainable, but I believe people are quoting the document, which is an error |
|||
my apoligies if i've messed up something with formats or something - complain to wiki admins who make the ssytem so complex |
Revision as of 15:19, 2 August 2012
Welcome Justanonymous!
Some pages of helpful information to get you started: | Some common sense Do's and Don'ts:
|
If you need further help, you can: | or even: |
Alternatively, leave me a message at my talk page or type {{helpme}}
here on your talk page, and someone will try to help.
There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
|
|
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the button on the edit toolbar or by typing four tildes (~~~~)
at the end of your post. This will automatically insert your signature, a link to this (your talk) page, and a timestamp.
To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put
{{My sandbox}}
on your userpage.Sincerely, CT Cooper · talk 16:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC) (Leave me a message)
I will respond to your message on my talk page. CT Cooper · talk 16:56, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
A brownie for you!
Keep up the good work on the Agenda 21 article! CT Cooper · talk 14:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC) |
agenda 21
I think you could make a case that since agenda 21 is a popular, or semi popular topic among right wing republicans (for want of a better term - if you want to replace right wing republican with a less charged term, no problem) it seems that a encyclopedia article on agenda 21 would cover how it is percieved (thats basic, right) and in that discussion, the right wing fantasys about the KGB/CIA/rothschild/soros world conspiracy would fit Further, that people seem to be *misquoting* the document is relevant; i agree that it is vague and you could argue that golf courses fit under unsustainable, but I believe people are quoting the document, which is an error my apoligies if i've messed up something with formats or something - complain to wiki admins who make the ssytem so complex