Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Messhermit/Workshop

This is a page for working on Arbitration decisions. It provides for suggestions by Arbitrators and other users and for comment by arbitrators, the parties and others. After the analysis of /Evidence here and development of proposed principles, findings of fact, and remedies. Anyone who edits should sign all suggestions and comments. Arbitrators will place proposed items they have confidence in on /Proposed decision.

Motions and requests by the parties

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed temporary injunctions

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1)

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed final decision

Proposed principles

Assume good faith

1) Wikipedia:Assume good faith contemplates the extension of courtesy and good will to other editors on the assumption that they, like you, are here to build an information resource with a neutral point of view.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Reliable sources

2) Information based on reliable published sources in acceptable. Lack of access to published literature by a contestant in an content dispute is not a basis for removal of well-sourced information.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Biased editing

3) A user who regularly and aggressively engages in biased editing with respect to an area of editing may be restricted with respect to editing in that area.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed principle}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed findings of fact

Template

1) {text of proposed finding of fact}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Locus of dispute

1) The locus of this dispute is a dispute between Andres_C. (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) and Messhermit (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) regarding alleged nationalistic editing of articles which relate to conflicts between Ecuador and Peru, see Talk:History of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian territorial dispute/Flamewar. Biased versions of events are part of the popular culture of both Peru and Ecuador, History_of_the_Ecuadorian-Peruvian_territorial_dispute#Education_and_public_perception.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Need to identify and incorporate the other side. Fred Bauder 12:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Failure of Messhermit to assume good faith

2) Messhermet fails to assume good faith, regarding Andres_C. as an opponent [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], and [7].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Who is he addressing? Fred Bauder 12:02, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

Andres_C. Fred Bauder 12:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Messhermit refuses to accept sources

3) Messhermit, for whatever reason, has internet access but does not seem to have good access to the written sources [8] cited by Andres C., and is not willing to accept them, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit/Evidence#Messhermit_has_repeatedly_called_into_question_my_good_faith.2C_and_misinterprets_Wikipedias.27_policy_on_Verifiability and [9]. Andres C.'s citations are not detailed, being only to books rather than to specific passages in specific books, but are generally acceptable [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16][17], [18], and [19].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Personal attacks by Messhermit

4) Messhermit has made personal attacks [20], [21], [22], and [23].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Messhermit and NPOV

5) Messhermit either misunderstands or opposes Wikipedia:Neutral point of view [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], and [29].

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Edit warring by Messhermit

6) Messhermit has engaged in sustained edit warring [30] and Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit/Evidence#Messhermit_violates_Wikipedia.27s_official_policy_on_Resolving_disputes_and_disregards_Wikipedia.27s_guidelines_on_Wikiquette_and__Reaching_Consensus.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Messhermit and dispute resolution

6) Messhermit has been unable or unwilling to effectively use the earlier steps in Wikipedia:Resolving disputes, see Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit/Evidence#Messhermit_violates_Wikipedia.27s_official_policy_on_Resolving_disputes_and_disregards_Wikipedia.27s_guidelines_on_Wikiquette_and__Reaching_Consensus.

Comment by Arbitrators:

This should have been resolved by mediation. Fred Bauder 15:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed remedies

Note: All remedies that refer to a period of time, for example to a ban of X months or a revert parole of Y months, are to run concurrently unless otherwise stated.

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Messhermit banned from Peru-Ecuador conflict

1) Messhermit is banned for one year from editing articles which relate to conflict between Peru and Ecuador. He may make comments and suggestions on article talk pages.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Messhermit placed on probation

2) Messhermit is placed on probation for five years. He may be banned from any article or talk page which he disrupts by any administrator. All bans to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed remedy}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Proposed enforcement

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Enforcement by block

1) If a ban imposed by this decision is violated, Messhermit may be briefly blocked, up to a week for repeat offenses. After five blocks, the maximum block shall increase to one year. All blocks to be logged at Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Messhermit#Log_of_blocks_and_bans.

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

1) {text of proposed enforcement}

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Analysis of evidence

Place here items of evidence (with diffs) and detailed analysis

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

Template

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others:

General discussion

Comment by Arbitrators:

Comment by parties:

Comment by others: