Talk:Nautilus-X: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by 71.22.123.181 - "→Substance: " |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/99.73.37.190|99.73.37.190]] ([[User talk:99.73.37.190|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. [[Special:Contributions/99.73.37.190|99.73.37.190]] ([[User talk:99.73.37.190|talk]]) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC).</span><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
It seem more likely that it would be parked at Lagrange Points (Earth-Moon or Earth L2) to avoid the gravity well. But seriously this is all a bunch of nonsense. They cannot even afford small science probes.--[[Special:Contributions/92.225.95.180|92.225.95.180]] ([[User talk:92.225.95.180|talk]]) 00:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:20, 8 August 2012
 | Spaceflight C‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
Substance
Has anything actually happened, or is this all just hypothetical? 68.49.23.150 (talk) 05:47, 3 June 2012 (UTC) I'm confused... is this a vessel to travel to another planet / moon or is it a space station? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.22.123.181 (talk) 01:18, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Nice article
I was looking for a Nautilus-X wiki article and google pointed me here. This is a heck of a start. It's better than a lot of pages out there that aren't marked 'stub'. I'd be happy to contribute when it goes prime time. The only correction I have is that in the third image, Nautilus-X Extended duration explorer.png, one of the labels should be spelled 'descent' vs 'decent'. I'd fix it myself, but I'm no good with image editing. I try to stick to code and article text. aremisasling (talk) 04:17, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! I just plan on adding a bit more information, and then I'll move it to the article name space within the next couple of hours. I'll be more then glad if you can contribute then as well! Xionbox₪ 15:41, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Bravo. I wonder if the NASA gang knows about this. I've been in communication with the JSC and Langley folks, and will try to get them to keep us posted on any reliably sourced materials we can use. Raising the consciousness of the interested community outside NASA seems like a good idea, if it can be done within Wikipedia's POV & COI rules of course. (Being a fanatic myself, I must keep these issues in mind.) Wwheaton (talk) 20:38, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
- This is a very interesting article, and I'm more than willing to provide help when necessary. Message me if you need a hand. --Rsteilberg 05:04, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
I don't see mention of the LEO it would take around Earth. Obviously, LEO as a low radiation area would be the best parking space near Earth. Is it not there? Or, am I just missing it? Thanks. 99.73.37.190 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC).
It seem more likely that it would be parked at Lagrange Points (Earth-Moon or Earth L2) to avoid the gravity well. But seriously this is all a bunch of nonsense. They cannot even afford small science probes.--92.225.95.180 (talk) 00:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)