Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GJ 1062: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:{{#if:yes|<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. </small>|{{error|This [[template:deletion sorting|template]] must be [[WP:SUBST|substituted]]!}}}} <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:{{#if:yes|<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science|list of Science-related deletion discussions]]. </small>|{{error|This [[template:deletion sorting|template]] must be [[WP:SUBST|substituted]]!}}}} <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 01:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
:'''Keep''' We do not have to delete because of NASTRO, and this star does occur in several important lists due to it being close to the sun and having very high proper motion. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 13:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
:'''Keep''' We do not have to delete because of NASTRO, and this star does occur in several important lists due to it being close to the sun and having very high proper motion. [[User:Graeme Bartlett|Graeme Bartlett]] ([[User talk:Graeme Bartlett|talk]]) 13:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
*'''Comment''' – [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?1998A%26A...329...81F Fuchs and Jahreiß (1998)] list this as one of a handful of nearby halo subdwarf stars. That might make it marginally notable. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 14:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Comment''' – [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-bib_query?1998A%26A...329...81F Fuchs and Jahreiß (1998)] list this as one of a handful of nearby halo subdwarf stars. That might make it marginally notable. It was one of the first three M-type subdwarfs detected by Kuiper in 1940. Regards, [[User:RJHall|RJH]] ([[User_talk:RJHall|''talk'']]) 14:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 14:52, 9 August 2012
- GJ 1062 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doens't meet WP:NASTRO. StringTheory11 (t • c) 23:39, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: I will point out that it is a High proper-motion Star and at apmag 13 is easily visible to amateur telescopes. How close to the Sun does a star need to be to be notable? -- Kheider (talk) 11:50, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep We do not have to delete because of NASTRO, and this star does occur in several important lists due to it being close to the sun and having very high proper motion. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:09, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment – Fuchs and Jahreiß (1998) list this as one of a handful of nearby halo subdwarf stars. That might make it marginally notable. It was one of the first three M-type subdwarfs detected by Kuiper in 1940. Regards, RJH (talk) 14:32, 9 August 2012 (UTC)