Jump to content

Talk:Hand signals: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m "Cycling project" renamed to primary name "WikiProject Cycling", to keep naming consistent, using AWB
Front / Rear brake: new section
Line 32: Line 32:


The US stop signal paragraph says to make a different sign than the illustration. Which is correct? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.50.25.105|68.50.25.105]] ([[User talk:68.50.25.105|talk]]) 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The US stop signal paragraph says to make a different sign than the illustration. Which is correct? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/68.50.25.105|68.50.25.105]] ([[User talk:68.50.25.105|talk]]) 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Front / Rear brake ==

"In many countries, the hand signal for stopping/braking requires that the cyclist signal with the hand used for the front brake, thus relying on the less effective rear brake to slow down."

When using the front brake, your bicycle can lift over to the front, so you should always use the rear brake. --[[Special:Contributions/80.187.103.149|80.187.103.149]] ([[User talk:80.187.103.149|talk]]) 16:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:08, 14 August 2012

WikiProject iconCycling Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

In the US riders use primarily the left hand to signal intentions on a bicycle because the right hand is usually on the bike's rear brake lever? Is it different in the UK, using the right hand and leaving the left hand on the bicycle? Are the controls reversed, or is this simply because the two countries drive on opposite sides of the road? Should this discussion be added to the article? -Speedeep 15:34, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)

Maybe add pictures

I think it might be useful to add pictures, the descriptions are not very clear, but I don't think they can be made any clearer without examples.


The pictures present are a welcome addition, however, the US Stop signal picture doesn't match the textual description! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Matthewwithanm (talkcontribs) 19:10, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Safety of extending right arm for right signal

I just removed the following paragraph which was added by User:slargy

Stephen G. Largy, Chair of the Mississauga Cycling Advisory Committee of Mississauga, Ontario, Canada; recommends the "left upper-arm out to the left, parallel to the road and angle your forearm vertically upward'" method for indicating a cyclist's right hand turn, as the only acceptable right hand signal method. This method recognizes that a bicycle is considered a vehicle of the road (thereby following automotive practice), however, and more importantly; the rider does not control the stopping option of the bicycle with their left hand (front brake). The sole use of the front brake for stopping severely reduces stopping ability, balance, and control. For safe and controlled cycling, use your left hand to signal all directional and stopping intent.

The reasons I am removing this paragraph are:

  1. Apparently, Stephen Largy is inserting his own POV.
  2. The reason using the right arm to signal right is not allowed in an automobile is because the right arm of the driver is inside the vehicle of a left-hand drive automobile. Allowing this method for bicyclists is not inconsistent with considering a bicycle to be a vehicle of the road. It's just logical.
  3. Automatic turn signals are so ubiquitous on automobiles now that many people don't even recognize what a right turn signal with the left arm is. The meaning of a right turn signal with the outstretched right arm, however, is obvious.
  4. The contention that "sole use of the front brake for stopping severely reduces stopping ability" is false. The League of American Bicyclists teaches in their education programs that the front brake provides 70% of the braking power. This is because applying either brake immediately shifts the weight forward and reduces the rear braking effectivity. For safe and controlled cycling, if both brakes are required, then neither hand should be used for signaling (a look back over the shoulder is a surprisingly effective substitute). But if you can afford to take one hand off, then removing the right hand is at least as good as removing the left.
  5. Quoting an uninformed source, regardless of his credentials, is not appropriate.

--Serge 18:38, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hand signals used by Car drivers and Military Hand signals?

It would be good to include these with pictures... I've failed to find anything on tinternet so far. --129.67.46.95 (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop signal confusing

The US stop signal paragraph says to make a different sign than the illustration. Which is correct? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.50.25.105 (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Front / Rear brake

"In many countries, the hand signal for stopping/braking requires that the cyclist signal with the hand used for the front brake, thus relying on the less effective rear brake to slow down."

When using the front brake, your bicycle can lift over to the front, so you should always use the rear brake. --80.187.103.149 (talk) 16:08, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]