Talk:Emily Giffin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:04, 23 August 2012

Biography: Arts and Entertainment Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Virginia: Albemarle County Stub‑class

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albemarle County, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Controversy Section

The controversy section keeps being removed with no explanation, despite numerous citations and references backing up the information presented. Perhaps the page needs protection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.177.24.248 (talk) 22:57, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs are completely unacceptable sources of negative content on a biography of a living person. I have protected the article from edits by new and unregistered users to prevent it from being re-added. Anyone who returns this content with actual reliable sources risks being blocked. Someguy1221 (talk) 23:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the blogs there was a news site reference, which counts as a reliable source. (TimesUnion.com) Also, it appears you misspoke: "Anyone who returns the content with actual reliable sources risks being blocked"? Don't you mean the opposite of that? Don't we WANT reliable sources?

Revision as of 23:01, 23 August 2012 edit Someguy1221 (talk \| contribs) Edit filter managers, Administrators 41,264 edits →Controversy Section: re ← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:04, 23 August 2012 edit undo 67.177.24.248 (talk) →Controversy Section Next edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:

	:Blogs are completely unacceptable sources of negative content on a biography of a living person. I have protected the article from edits by new and unregistered users to prevent it from being re-added. Anyone who returns this content with actual [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] risks being blocked. [[User:Someguy1221\|Someguy1221]] ([[User talk:Someguy1221\|talk]]) 23:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)		:Blogs are completely unacceptable sources of negative content on a biography of a living person. I have protected the article from edits by new and unregistered users to prevent it from being re-added. Anyone who returns this content with actual [[WP:RS\|reliable sources]] risks being blocked. [[User:Someguy1221\|Someguy1221]] ([[User talk:Someguy1221\|talk]]) 23:01, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

			In addition to the blogs there was a news site reference, which counts as a reliable source. (TimesUnion.com) Also, it appears you misspoke: "Anyone who returns the content with actual reliable sources risks being blocked"? Don't you mean the opposite of that? Don't we WANT reliable sources?