Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Game theory: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Undid revision 508543844 by 184.43.22.61 (talk)
Undid revision 508543638 by 184.43.22.61 (talk)
Line 8: Line 8:


==Title==
==Title==
'''WikiProject on Game theory'''
"Gay dog on crack"


==Scope==
==Scope==

Revision as of 21:55, 26 August 2012

Some Wikipedians have formed a project to better organize information in articles related to Game theory. This page and its subpages contain their suggestions; it is hoped that this project will help to focus the efforts of other Wikipedians. If you would like to help, please inquire on the talk page and see the to-do list there.

For more information on WikiProjects, please see Wikipedia:WikiProjects and Wikipedia:WikiProject best practices.

Game theory articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
GA 1 1 2 4
B 4 13 13 1 1 32
C 7 15 18 22 13 75
Start 8 29 61 85 61 244
Stub 1 5 13 29 13 61
List 1 1
NA 2 2 1 10 71 86
Assessed 22 66 107 147 71 90 503
Total 22 66 107 147 71 90 503
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 1,990 Ω = 4.78

Title

WikiProject on Game theory

Scope

This project is designed to coordinate efforts on Wikipedia pages pertaining to Game theory. This is an interdisciplinary study encompassing Mathematics, Economics, Political science, Psychology, Biology, Computer science and Philosophy. All participants are welcome!

Since game theory is used by many different disciplines, it is related to many different wikiprojects. Ones with whom we have overlapping interest are:

Announcements

  • My name is Adam Kalai and I am a professor at Georgia Tech. I am teaching a graduate class in Game Theory. As part of the final, I have asked each student to create/improve a Wikipedia entry on game theory. I hope they have done a good job! 4 May, 2004.
  • I have nominated List of games in game theory for a featured list. Unfortunately, not many people want to review it. Would people involved in this project mind chiming in one way or another? --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 03:13, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I am working on material for an undergraduate course on decision theory and game theory that develops the math as needed through actual problems encountered in applications throughout the social sciences. When it fills out, it's to be suitable for an audience without a social science background and little math background, up to upper level econ students who use game theory as a primary tool. (My actual class requires one calc class.) Look at the evolving wiki Self Interest and Social Behavior [1] and contribute if you wish. (As a guest, add "— Your Name" at the end of any page that you modify.) Dan Alger 13 June 2006
  • Our article Game theory has now joined Prisoner's dilemma and Rock, Paper, Scissors as a Featured Article. Congrats everyone! --best, kevin [kzollman][talk] 16:10, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
*high five* good work Kevin. Pete.Hurd 16:23, 6 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Wow! They even beat out Deep Throat and Masturbation! *shakes head in disbelief* ...kids today... Pete.Hurd 02:24, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Participants

To add yourself to the list of project participants, go to the list of WikiProject Game theory participants.

If you would like to display a WikiProject Game theory Userbox on your User page, use this template: {{User WikiProject Game theory}}. The following will be produced:

This user is a participant in the
WikiProject Game theory.

Tasks

GameTheory.net has a very nice collection of class notes and a dictionary. If you don't know the area offhand but want to learn this is a great way. Also, most economic publications are distributed on the web long before they ever reach publication. A Google Scholar search will produce lots of papers (although they may be hard to understand in some cases).

Please add a task to this list. If needed explain what you think needs to be done.

Articles to create

Some of these may just need to be redirected.

  1. Adaptive learning
  2. Asynchrony - disambig, no game theory. need Asynchrony (game theory)
  3. Bargaining set
  4. Bidder's choice Auction
  5. Bidding increment
  6. Button auction
  7. Cardinal payoffs
  8. Combinatorial auction
  9. Combinatorial bid
  10. Conjectural equilibrium
  11. Cournot learning/Cournot dynamics/Cournot updating (should this just redirect to best response? No yet, Topic needs writing up either way Pete.Hurd 17:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]
  12. Equilibrium refinements (e.g.: Intuitive criterion, Forward induction) (Ch 8 & 11 in Fudenberg & Tirole), Limit ESS (Selten)
  13. Farsightedness - disambig, no game theory. need Farsightedness (game theory)
  14. First price auction
  15. Generic payoff
  16. Hicks optimal
  17. Largest consistent set
  18. Minimum bid
  19. Multicomponent Attrition Game-Different from War of Attrition, this game amounts to a series of rounds with rock-paper-scissors style matrix, with the loser being penalized by a loss of options/resources in further rounds.
  20. Network stability
  21. Nucleolus
  22. Ordinal payoffs
  23. Pareto coordination game → include in Coordination game | Done, redirect set. ~ trialsanderrors 19:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Pareto dominated (redirect to pareto optimal, and add a sentence there?)
  25. Pooling equilibrium (discussed on pg 238 of Osborne & Rubenstein, see also Gibbons 1992)
  26. Potential game → Created ~ trialsanderrors 08:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Power measure
  28. Principal agent/Principal agent model
  29. Proxy bidder
  30. Public good game → should this redirect to Public goods game?
  31. Pure coordination game → include in Coordination game
  32. Risk dominance/Risk dominant equilibrium → include in Stag hunt (see pp 20-21 Fudenberg & Tirole) Created ~ trialsanderrors 08:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Schedule bid
  34. Sequential equilibrium (defined on pg 225 of Osborne & Rubenstein, sect 8.3 in Fudenberg & Tirole)). I've created this page, Bromille 09:56, 31 May 2006 (UTC).[reply]
  35. Separating equilibrium (discussed on pg 238 of Osborne & Rubenstein, see also Gibbons 1992)
  36. Simultaneous game/Static game
  37. Static game (see Gibbons 1992 pp 1-2 & 143-144, )
  38. Stationary Bayesian learning/Stationary Bayesian learning dynamics
  39. Strategic move
  40. Threat point
  41. Variable sum game - I think this is a `rest' class that does not deserve a page Koczy 16:12, 30 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Volunteer's dilemma (redirect to chicken, and add a sentence there?)

Stubs to expand

(a good place to get started if you want to help but don't have a definite idea of how)

  1. Ambiguity aversion --1diot 21:12, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Auction theory
  3. Bishop-Cannings theorem (ultra-stubby Pete.Hurd 06:45, 15 November 2005 (UTC))[reply]
  4. Discriminatory price auction
  5. Evolutionarily stable state: now a stub, but maybe it's done Pete.Hurd 17:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Multiunit auction
  7. Precommitment - needs a lot of help. Remember 13:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  8. Quantal response equilibrium - stub, and not quite correct Cretog8 (talk) 03:48, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Repeated game --best, kevin └ KZOLLMAN/ TALK┐ 17:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  10. Revelation principle
  11. Sealed bid auction
  12. Self-confirming equilibrium
  13. Trembling hand perfect equilibrium/Trembling hand perfection (needs expansion) --best, kevin └ KZOLLMAN/ TALK┐ 17:06, 16 November 2005 (UTC). I've expanded it but forgot to sign in - it's an anonymous change of today. Bromille 09:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Uncorrelated asymmetry: longish stub, maybe it's done Pete.Hurd 17:02, 19 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  15. Uniform price auction
  16. War of attrition (game): Needs explicit formulation, proof of ESS Pete.Hurd 16:29, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Articles to modify

  • perfect information The core definition at the top of the page seems inconsistent with the definition. I made a comment on the talk page a few months ago. It states that for perfect information "all players know all moves that have taken place" but this would mean that any card game would be a game of perfect information. Can someone please confirm that this is either right or wrong.Tetron76 (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I have modified the one sentence definition to be consistant with the usage in games, the rest of the article and other sources but did not find a direct source to quote.Tetron76 (talk) 11:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Standardization issues

  • We currently use many different articles when referring to "rational actors" or "behaving rationally". We have a stub perfect rationality, but this might be better served as a redirect for homo economicus. Discuss on the talk page.

Ratings and Assessments

Please help us clean out Category:Unassessed game theory articles and Category:Unrated game theory articles. For assessments see Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment for a description of what they mean. For the importance ratings, please use the following scale:

  • Top: articles which the general public might be interested in (i.e. game theory, nash equilibrium, and prisoner's dilemma)
  • High: articles which might occur in an undergraduate class (e.g. ultimatum game, best response, subgame perfect equilibrium, etc.)
  • Mid: articles which would occur in any graduate course (e.g. fictitious play, rationalizability, common knowledge)
  • Low: everything else

The ratings are done using parameters to the {{GameTheoryProject}} (which appears on the talk page of relevant articles). Please see its page for instructions.

Are there perhaps statistics available on how often a page is viewed in Wikipedia? That should help us to set priorities.Koczy 17:28, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm, I remember Kevin digging up some page listing most visited pages on WP once, and having some GT page high up on the list. But I also remember the list being really stale, and not looking like it was updated. Beyond that I don't know, but it sure does seem like a good idea for prioritizing effort. Pete.Hurd 17:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Templates

{{Infobox equilibrium}}

{{GameTheoryProject}}

WikiProject iconGame theory Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help!
Join in | Fix a red link | Add content | Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

{{Game theory}}

Opera Football
Opera 3,2 1,1
Football 0,0 2,3
Battle of the Sexes 2

{{Payoff matrix}}

Stub templates

Currently stubs are marked with {{gametheory-stub}}, and if necessary with {{econ-stub}} and sometimes {{math-stub}}

Categories

Wikipedia articles on Game theory

Maintaining a complete list would be far too hard and not terribly useful. All of our pages will appear in Category:Game theory. Also, a list of pages that use the above template can be found here. The main article is: Game theory.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Game_theory&oldid=509318174"