Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beit David neighborhood: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
k |
Wesley Wolf (talk | contribs) →Beit David neighborhood: comment |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel|list of Israel-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)</small> |
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel|list of Israel-related deletion discussions]]. <!--Template:Deletion sorting--></small> <small>[[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 15:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)</small> |
||
*'''Keep''' In Jerusalem even a small area can be significant. The English language article was a foolishly brief machine translation of the first few sentences of the extensive article in the heWP. I must accept some responsibility for this, for I deprodded the article, and neglected to either expand it myself from there,find someone to do it, or even mark that it should be expanded. Unfortunately, for me to work with this material I can only make use of the Google translation and rewrite it in grammatical English. This is not a very good way of doing a translation, and I must defer to someone who actually does know the language. I can however make an approximate start at it which will at least clarify the importance nd give some context. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 16:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' In Jerusalem even a small area can be significant. The English language article was a foolishly brief machine translation of the first few sentences of the extensive article in the heWP. I must accept some responsibility for this, for I deprodded the article, and neglected to either expand it myself from there,find someone to do it, or even mark that it should be expanded. Unfortunately, for me to work with this material I can only make use of the Google translation and rewrite it in grammatical English. This is not a very good way of doing a translation, and I must defer to someone who actually does know the language. I can however make an approximate start at it which will at least clarify the importance nd give some context. '''[[User:DGG| DGG]]''' ([[User talk:DGG| talk ]]) 16:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
||
:*'''Comment''' - you could always consider [[WP:USERFY|userfication]] to allow someone to further expand the article. And if translation is an issue, perhaps requesting assistance from [[Wikipedia:Translation]] team. <b style="background:black">[[User:Wesley Mouse|<font color="#84E8FF" face="Eurostile">Wesley</font>]] [[User talk:Wesley Mouse|<font color="#FFE500" face="Eurostile">Mouse</font>]]</b> 16:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:43, 28 August 2012
- Beit David neighborhood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable, OR. I did a little research, and this is not a neighbourhood in the sense of a suburb or a district. It's a small compound of about ten apartments in Rabbi Kook St., Jerusalem.
- Keep - It does seem to be a bonafide Jerusalem neighborhood, and a historic one at that. [1][2] Being only the fourth neighborhood built outside the Old City is pretty significant. The Hebrew WP article] is a good place to start for more content. --Oakshade (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep - It is important chapter in the history of Jerusalem and the architecture of old israel. פארוק (talk) 07:55, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin - Please note that פארוק (talk · contribs) has an indefinite ban from all articles and discussions covered under ARBPIA. Wesley Mouse 16:35, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Keep In Jerusalem even a small area can be significant. The English language article was a foolishly brief machine translation of the first few sentences of the extensive article in the heWP. I must accept some responsibility for this, for I deprodded the article, and neglected to either expand it myself from there,find someone to do it, or even mark that it should be expanded. Unfortunately, for me to work with this material I can only make use of the Google translation and rewrite it in grammatical English. This is not a very good way of doing a translation, and I must defer to someone who actually does know the language. I can however make an approximate start at it which will at least clarify the importance nd give some context. DGG ( talk ) 16:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - you could always consider userfication to allow someone to further expand the article. And if translation is an issue, perhaps requesting assistance from Wikipedia:Translation team. Wesley Mouse 16:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)