Talk:Oroville Dam: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:29, 31 August 2012

Oroville Dam is currently a Computing and engineering good article nominee. Nominated by Shann_º n at 18:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.

California C‑class High‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dams C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Flood protection cost savings

This article needs sources. It makes allegations regarding the cost savings from flood protection but does not provide a source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.154.96 (talk) 07:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Oroville Dam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 00:20, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is a very nice, well-written article. I've only a few minor comments:

"it is the tallest dam in the U.S." - I added " as of 2012" - is this correct?
NealthNewsDigest.com - is this a reliable source for damage prevented?
"Groundbreaking on the dam site occurred in May 1957 with the relocation of the Western Pacific Railroad tracks that ran through the Feather River canyon." - the relocation of the railroad tracks was the groundbreaking?
I've made a few edits that you're free to correct.[1]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

Is it reasonably well written?
a. prose: clear and concise, respects copyright laws, correct spelling and grammar:

b. complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
a. provides references to all sources in the section(s) dedicated to footnotes/citations according to the guide to layout:

b. provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

c. no original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic:

b. it remains focused and does not go into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.
fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
no edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
a. images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

b. images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

The few comments I made above are not enough to hold up the passing of this article. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:35, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{GA nominee|18:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Shannon1|<font face="Mistral" color="#008080" size="4">Shann]][[User talk:Shannon1|<sub><font color = "#4682B4" face = "Perpetua" size = "4">'''º'''</font></sub>]][[Special:Contributions/Shannon1|<font face="Mistral" color="#4B6CFC" size="4">n</font></span>]]<font color = "blue"></font>|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=|note=}}
+{{GA nominee|18:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Shannon1|<font face="Mistral" color="#008080" size="4">Shann]][[User talk:Shannon1|<sub><font color = "#4682B4" face = "Perpetua" size = "4">'''º'''</font></sub>]][[Special:Contributions/Shannon1|<font face="Mistral" color="#4B6CFC" size="4">n</font></span>]]<font color = "blue"></font>|page=1|subtopic=Computing and engineering|status=onreview|note=}}
 {{WikiProject California|class=C|importance=high}}
 {{WikiProject Dams|class=C|importance=high}}
@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ==Flood protection cost savings==
 This article needs sources. It makes allegations regarding the cost savings from flood protection but does not provide a source.  <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.200.154.96|76.200.154.96]] ([[User talk:76.200.154.96|talk]]) 07:01, 24 August 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
+{{Talk:Oroville Dam/GA1}}