Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx

Padmalakshmisx

Padmalakshmisx (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx/Archive.

28 August 2012

– This SPI case is open.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Nandhakishore (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• 12pavan34 (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.

Same range of articles, Cinema of Andhra Pradesh and specifically the Guinness record section in the article. Addresses users after they revert his edits with an odd heading and multiple question marks and paragraphs (1, 2, 3, previous sock) and blanks his own talk page after a welcome template is put up without a summary (4, previous sock). Also uses similar kinds of edit summaries which tend to be misleading (5, previous sock). Secret of success (talk) 14:43, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

• Certainly a sock based on their editing pattern and obsession with Telugu cinema. I also suspect User:12pavan34 based on similar investigations. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 09:50, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
• And this one too. —Vensatry _{(Ping me)} 03:21, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

• These are quacking socks, but I have limited on-wiki time for a while, so I'm not going to block as I may not be able to provide any explanations if required. However, rather than a duck block, a sleeper check would be beneficial as there are serial accounts now. —SpacemanSpiff 10:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

• I request a sock puppet test be conducted on User:Vensatry and User:Secret of success, as I suspect one of them has written on my talk page using an IP address in reply to my editing. See this diff 1
  they use the same title of storming telugu cinema

Please see the latest edits by User:Vensatry clicking here 1 which clearly shows that he has put information which is disputed for nuetrality clearly violates WP:NPOV. This information includes usage of phrasess like Tamil films dominate Telugu Films, they have overtaken Telugu films in the local market. Vensatry and Secret of success both from a Tamil land themselves; they are using their experience on wikipedia to compromise the Telugu cinema article.

The edit i made before Vensatry is this. In User:Vensatry's diff it also clearly shows that he has deleted well cited Guinness records and also tried to write two different records into one sentence trying to make reader not to differentiate them as two different records. He has not spoken anything on the talk page but reverted changes which had POV-statement and POV-section tags.

See my edits that I put immediately after him.

He has tried to accuse User:Dragon Booster who is also from Andhra Pradesh as sock puppet and that user came out clean similarly I request the investigators to investigate me thoroughly and if and when I come out clean I request some desciplinary action be taken against User:Vensatry and User:secret of success

12pavan34 (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes I agree on the disciplinary action on the two users (Vensatry and Secret of Success) is definitely needed, they are conspiring on who ever edits Telugu cinema article, it is really frustrating, definitely there is no sock puppet among us.Nandhakishore (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

---