User talk:Secret of success

User talk Contributions Email Me Edit Count SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia. The Signpost: 27 August 2012 News and notes: Tough journey for new travel guide Recent research: New influence graph visualizations; NPOV and history; 'low-hanging fruit' Technology report: Just how bad is the code review backlog? Featured content: Wikipedia rivals The New Yorker: Mark Arsten WikiProject report: From sonic screwdrivers to jelly babies: Doctor Who Discussion report: Sidebar and main page alterations; Recent Deaths; Education Program extension Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 06:38, 29 August 2012 (UTC) Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved! Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username. To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1 If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration. A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations. HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:33, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Chennai Collaboration of the month Chennai Collaboration of the Month Thank you for being a part of the nomination cum voting process of Chennai Collaboration of the Month. The Chennai article has been selected for Collaboration for the month of September. Lets target bringing it to GA/FA within the end of September. I personally look forward to your contributions to the article. --Anbu121 (talk me) 17:41, 31 August 2012 (UTC) Note: If you are seeing this message on someone's talk page and wish to be a part of the collaboration, add yourself in the members list. You've got mail! Hello, Secret of success. Please check your email; you've got mail! Message added 06:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template. —Vensatry (Ping me) 06:23, 2 September 2012 (UTC) tell me why Pls giv me a reason why u removed some content in the impact section of Billa 2 article. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:49, 3 September 2012 (UTC) Answer me! Kailash29792 (talk) 14:44, 5 September 2012 (UTC) The Signpost: 03 September 2012 News and notes: World's largest photo competition kicks off; WMF legal fees proposal Technology report: Time for a MediaWiki Foundation? Featured content: Wikipedia's Seven Days of Terror Op-ed: Dispute resolution – where we're at, what we're doing well, and what needs fixing Read this Signpost in full Single-page Unsubscribe EdwardsBot (talk) 12:13, 4 September 2012 (UTC) Jsigned Hey, since you recently reverted on of Jsigned's edits on Taare Zameen Par, I just wanted to let you know that I have reported him on the ANI here. Thanks. Ωphois 23:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC) For your Info who ever edits Telugu cinema article is not a sock puppet, glad that some user got the fact, now your games of conspiracy wont work in future. Nandhakishore (talk) 15:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Hii kindly stop your non sense Nandhakishore (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC) retained constructive edits, that is also clean pleae stop your POV, who are you to revert my edits Nandhakishore (talk) 04:33, 8 September 2012 (UTC) on top of it, without using common sense you are reverting other peoples edits also, Nandhakishore (talk) 04:35, 8 September 2012 (UTC) not convincing not convincing constructive edits must be retained, You are edit warring and storming the article and u dare to accuse me Nandhakishore (talk) 04:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC) You are free to edit and I am here to improve the article, but you are not authorized to remove constructive editsNandhakishore (talk) 04:47, 8 September 2012 (UTC) Hii okay, I will open new case, stop your non sense Nandhakishore (talk) 05:06, 8 September 2012 (UTC) doesnt matter the case is still open,dont waste my time and energy Nandhakishore (talk) 05:10, 8 September 2012 (UTC)