Talk:Cathedral (short story): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 12:14, 10 September 2012

Novels: Short story Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Short story task force.
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

The current plot, motif, and theme sections are all open to interpretation. The summary section is also more of a response than a summary.130.101.162.84 (talk) 14:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT REQUEST: I suggest we remove the sentence: 'With its publication Carver finally received the critical praise he had longed for.' Carver received much critical acclaim before Cathedral, and this suggests a dependence on critical acclaim that is reductive.

Revision as of 20:34, 26 March 2011 edit Tassedethe (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Administrators 1,361,877 edits m moved Talk:Cathedral (story) to Talk:Cathedral (short story): dab style ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:14, 10 September 2012 edit undo Chronotopian (talk \| contribs) 213 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The current plot, motif, and theme sections are all open to interpretation. The summary section is also more of a response than a summary.[[Special:Contributions/130.101.162.84\|130.101.162.84]] ([[User talk:130.101.162.84\|talk]]) 14:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)		The current plot, motif, and theme sections are all open to interpretation. The summary section is also more of a response than a summary.[[Special:Contributions/130.101.162.84\|130.101.162.84]] ([[User talk:130.101.162.84\|talk]]) 14:21, 9 February 2009 (UTC)


			EDIT REQUEST: I suggest we remove the sentence: 'With its publication Carver finally received the critical praise he had longed for.' Carver received much critical acclaim before ''Cathedral'', and this suggests a dependence on critical acclaim that is reductive.