VIA Nano: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Unlike [[Intel]] and [[AMD]], VIA uses two distinct development code names for each of its CPU cores. In this case, the codename 'CN' was used in the [[United States]] by Centaur Technology. Biblical names are used as codes by VIA in [[Taiwan]], and Isaiah was the choice for this particular processor and architecture. It is expected that the VIA Isaiah will be twice as fast in integer performance and four times as fast in [[floating-point]] performance as the previous-generation [[VIA Esther]] at an equivalent [[clock speed]]. Power consumption is also expected to be on par with the previous-generation VIA CPUs, with [[thermal design power]] ranging from 5 W to 25 W.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/downloads/presentations/processors/pb_via-isaiah_080124.pdf|title=VIA Isaiah Architecture Introduction|accessdate=28 May 2008|format=PDF|date=23 January 2008}}</ref> Being a completely new design, the Isaiah architecture was built with support for features like the [[x86-64]] instruction set and [[x86 virtualization]] which were unavailable on its predecessors, the [[VIA C7]] line, while retaining their encryption extensions. Several independent tests showed that the VIA Nano performs better than the single-core [[Intel Atom]] across a variety of workloads.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article/2008/07/29/intel_atom_vsvia_nano|title=Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano|publisher=[[HardOCP|[H]ard|OCP]]|first=Kyle|last=Bennett|date=29 July 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://hothardware.com/Articles/VIA-Nano-L2100-vs-Intel-Atom-230-Head-to-Head/?page=7|title=VIA Nano L2100 vs. Intel Atom 230: Head to Head|publisher=[[HotHardware]]|first=Marco|last=Chiappetta|date=29 July 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://pcper.com/article.php?aid=597|title=VIA Nano and Intel Atom Review – Battle of the Tiny CPUs|first=Ryan|last=Shrout|date=29 July 2008|publisher=[[PC Perspective]]}}</ref> In a 2008 [[Ars Technica]] test, a VIA Nano gained significant performance after its CPUID changed to Intel, hinting at the possibility that the benchmark software only checks the CPUID instead of the actual features supported by the CPU to choose a code path.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://arstechnica.com/hardware/reviews/2008/07/atom-nano-review.ars/6|title=Low-end grudge match: Nano vs. Atom|publisher=Ars Technica|first=Joel|last=Hruska|date=29 July 2008}}</ref> |
Unlike [[Intel]] and [[AMD]], VIA uses two distinct development code names for each of its CPU cores. In this case, the codename 'CN' was used in the [[United States]] by Centaur Technology. Biblical names are used as codes by VIA in [[Taiwan]], and Isaiah was the choice for this particular processor and architecture. It is expected that the VIA Isaiah will be twice as fast in integer performance and four times as fast in [[floating-point]] performance as the previous-generation [[VIA Esther]] at an equivalent [[clock speed]]. Power consumption is also expected to be on par with the previous-generation VIA CPUs, with [[thermal design power]] ranging from 5 W to 25 W.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/downloads/presentations/processors/pb_via-isaiah_080124.pdf|title=VIA Isaiah Architecture Introduction|accessdate=28 May 2008|format=PDF|date=23 January 2008}}</ref> Being a completely new design, the Isaiah architecture was built with support for features like the [[x86-64]] instruction set and [[x86 virtualization]] which were unavailable on its predecessors, the [[VIA C7]] line, while retaining their encryption extensions. Several independent tests showed that the VIA Nano performs better than the single-core [[Intel Atom]] across a variety of workloads.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://enthusiast.hardocp.com/article/2008/07/29/intel_atom_vsvia_nano|title=Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano|publisher=[[HardOCP|[H]ard|OCP]]|first=Kyle|last=Bennett|date=29 July 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://hothardware.com/Articles/VIA-Nano-L2100-vs-Intel-Atom-230-Head-to-Head/?page=7|title=VIA Nano L2100 vs. Intel Atom 230: Head to Head|publisher=[[HotHardware]]|first=Marco|last=Chiappetta|date=29 July 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://pcper.com/article.php?aid=597|title=VIA Nano and Intel Atom Review – Battle of the Tiny CPUs|first=Ryan|last=Shrout|date=29 July 2008|publisher=[[PC Perspective]]}}</ref> In a 2008 [[Ars Technica]] test, a VIA Nano gained significant performance after its CPUID changed to Intel, hinting at the possibility that the benchmark software only checks the CPUID instead of the actual features supported by the CPU to choose a code path.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://arstechnica.com/hardware/reviews/2008/07/atom-nano-review.ars/6|title=Low-end grudge match: Nano vs. Atom|publisher=Ars Technica|first=Joel|last=Hruska|date=29 July 2008}}</ref> |
||
On November 3, 2009, VIA launched the Nano 3000 series. VIA claims that these models can offer a 20% performance boost and 20% more energy efficiency than the Nano 1000 and 2000 series.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=4247|title=VIA Introduces New VIA Nano 3000 Series Processors|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]|date=3 November 2009}}</ref> Benchmarks run by VIA claim that a 1.6 GHz 3000-series Nano can outperform the aging Intel Atom N270 by about 40–54%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/nano/|title=VIA Nano Processor|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]}}</ref> The 3000 series adds an [[SSE4]] instruction set, which was first completely introduced in the [[Intel]] [[Core i7]]. (A subset of the instructions called [[SSE4.1]] was introduced in the second generation of [[Core 2]] processors |
On November 3, 2009, VIA launched the Nano 3000 series. VIA claims that these models can offer a 20% performance boost and 20% more energy efficiency than the Nano 1000 and 2000 series.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/resources/pressroom/pressrelease.jsp?press_release_no=4247|title=VIA Introduces New VIA Nano 3000 Series Processors|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]|date=3 November 2009}}</ref> Benchmarks run by VIA claim that a 1.6 GHz 3000-series Nano can outperform the aging Intel Atom N270 by about 40–54%.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/nano/|title=VIA Nano Processor|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]}}</ref> The 3000 series adds an [[SSE4]] instruction set, which was first completely introduced in the [[Intel]] [[Core i7]]. (A subset of the instructions called [[SSE4.1]] was introduced in the second generation of [[Core 2]] processors. |
||
On November 11, 2011, VIA released the VIA Nano X2 Dual-Core Processor with their first ever dual core pico-itx mainboard. The VIA Nano X2 is built on a 40nm process and supports compatibility with the [[SSE4.1]] instruction set. |
On November 11, 2011, VIA released the VIA Nano X2 Dual-Core Processor with their first ever dual core pico-itx mainboard. The VIA Nano X2 is built on a 40nm process and supports compatibility with the [[SSE4.1]] instruction set. Via claims of a 30% boost in performance in comparison to Intel's Atom with a 50% higher clock)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.via.com.tw/en/products/processors/nanoX2/whitepaper.jsp|title=VIA Nano x2 Processor SPECfp2000 Benchmarks|publisher=[[VIA Technologies|VIA]]}}</ref>. |
||
==Features== |
==Features== |
Revision as of 13:42, 10 September 2012
This article's lead section may be too long. (April 2012) |
This article contains promotional content. (April 2012) |
General information | |
---|---|
Marketed by | VIA Technologies |
Designed by | Centaur Technology |
Common manufacturers | |
Performance | |
FSB speeds | 533 MHz to 1066 MHz |
Architecture and classification | |
Microarchitecture | VIA Isaiah |
Instruction set | x86-64 |
Physical specifications | |
Cores |
|
Package |
|
Products, models, variants | |
Core name |
|
The VIA Nano (formerly code-named VIA Isaiah) is a 64-bit CPU for personal computers. The VIA Nano was released by VIA Technologies in 2008 after five years of development[1] by its CPU division, Centaur Technology. This new Isaiah 64-bit architecture was designed from scratch, unveiled on 24 January 2008,[2][3][4][5] and launched on May 29, including low-voltage variants and the Nano brand name.[6] The processor supports a number of VIA-specific x86 extensions designed to boost efficiency in low-power appliances.
Unlike Intel and AMD, VIA uses two distinct development code names for each of its CPU cores. In this case, the codename 'CN' was used in the United States by Centaur Technology. Biblical names are used as codes by VIA in Taiwan, and Isaiah was the choice for this particular processor and architecture. It is expected that the VIA Isaiah will be twice as fast in integer performance and four times as fast in floating-point performance as the previous-generation VIA Esther at an equivalent clock speed. Power consumption is also expected to be on par with the previous-generation VIA CPUs, with thermal design power ranging from 5 W to 25 W.[7] Being a completely new design, the Isaiah architecture was built with support for features like the x86-64 instruction set and x86 virtualization which were unavailable on its predecessors, the VIA C7 line, while retaining their encryption extensions. Several independent tests showed that the VIA Nano performs better than the single-core Intel Atom across a variety of workloads.[8][9][10] In a 2008 Ars Technica test, a VIA Nano gained significant performance after its CPUID changed to Intel, hinting at the possibility that the benchmark software only checks the CPUID instead of the actual features supported by the CPU to choose a code path.[11]
On November 3, 2009, VIA launched the Nano 3000 series. VIA claims that these models can offer a 20% performance boost and 20% more energy efficiency than the Nano 1000 and 2000 series.[12] Benchmarks run by VIA claim that a 1.6 GHz 3000-series Nano can outperform the aging Intel Atom N270 by about 40–54%.[13] The 3000 series adds an SSE4 instruction set, which was first completely introduced in the Intel Core i7. (A subset of the instructions called SSE4.1 was introduced in the second generation of Core 2 processors.
On November 11, 2011, VIA released the VIA Nano X2 Dual-Core Processor with their first ever dual core pico-itx mainboard. The VIA Nano X2 is built on a 40nm process and supports compatibility with the SSE4.1 instruction set. Via claims of a 30% boost in performance in comparison to Intel's Atom with a 50% higher clock)[14].
Features
- x86-64 instruction set
- Superscalar out-of-order instruction execution
- 65 nm manufacturing process
- 40 nm manufacturing process for VIA Nano x2
- Clock speed of 1 GHz to 2 GHz
- Bus speed of 533 MHz or 800 MHz (1066 MHz in Nano x2)
- Support for ECC
- x86 virtualization (Intel-compatible implementation), deactivated before stepping 3
- 32 KB L1 cache and 512 KB L2 cache, 64 KB L1 cache and 1 MB L2 cache (in Nano x2)
- Pin-compatible with the VIA C7 and VIA EDEN
Architecture improvements
- Out-of-order and superscalar design: Providing much better performance than its predecessor, the VIA C7 processor, which was in-order. This puts the Isaiah architecture in line with current offerings from AMD and Intel, except for Intel Atom which has an in-order design.
- Instructions fusion: Allows the processor to combine some instructions as a single instruction, reducing power requirements and giving higher performance (the Atom uses a similar strategy in processing x86 instructions in a more 'whole' manner, rather than breaking them into RISC-like micro-ops).
- Improved branch prediction: Uses eight predictors in two pipeline stages.
- CPU cache design: An exclusive cache design means that contents of the L1 cache is not duplicated in the L2 cache, providing a larger total cache.
- Data prefetch: Incorporating new mechanisms for data-prefetch, including both the loading of a special 64-line cache before loading the L2 cache and a direct load to the L1 cache.
- Fetches 4 x86 instructions per cycle as opposed to Intel's 3-5
- Issues 3 micro-operations/clock to execution units
- Memory access: Merging of smaller stores into larger load data.
- Execution units: Seven execution units are available, that allows up to seven micro-ops being executed per clock.
- 2 Integer units
- One unit (ALU1) is feature complete, while the other (ALU2) lacks some low usage instructions and therefore can be used more often for tasks like address calculations.
- 2 Store units (VIA refer to this as one for Address Store and another for Data Store)
- 1 Load unit
- 2 Media units with 128-bit wide datapath, supporting 4 single precision or 2 double-precision operations.
- One unit (MEDIA-A) correspond to floating point support, 2-clock latency for single-precision and double-precision add instructions, integer SIMD, encryption, divide and square root.
- The other unit (MEDIA-B) performs single-precision multiplies, with 3-clock latency for double-precision multiplies.
- 2 Integer units
- Media computation: Refers to the use of floating point execution units.
- Using an execution unit for floating point computation and another for multiplication allows the execution of up to four floating point and four multiplies per clock.
- A new implementation of FP-addition with the lowest latency (in clocks) seen in x86 processors so far.
- Almost all integer SIMD instructions execute in one clock.
- Implements MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3 multimedia instruction sets
- Implements SSE4 multimedia instruction set (VIA Nano 3000 series)
- Implements SSE4.1 multimedia instruction set (VIA Nano x2 series)
- Power Management: Besides requiring very low power, many new features are included.
- Includes a new C6 power state (Caches are flushed, internal state saved, and core voltage is turned off).
- Adaptive P-State Control: Transition between performance and voltage states without stopping execution.
- Adaptive Overclocking: Automatic overclocking if there is low temperature in the processor core.
- Adaptive Thermal Limit: Adjusting of the processor to maintain a user predefined temperature.
- Encryption: Includes the VIA PadLock engine
- Hardware support for AES encryption, secure hash algorithm SHA-1 and SHA-256 and Random Number Generation
See also
References
- ^ "VIA to launch new processor architecture in 1Q08" (subscription required). DigiTimes. Retrieved 25 July 2007.
- ^ Stokes, Jon (23 January 2008). "Isaiah revealed: VIA's new low-power architecture". Ars Technica. Retrieved 24 January 2008.
- ^ Bennett, Kyle (24 January 2008). "VIA's New Centaur Designed Isaiah CPU Architecture". [H]ard|OCP. Retrieved 24 January 2008.
- ^ "Via launches 64-bit architecture". LinuxDevices.com. 23 January 2008. Retrieved 24 January 2008.
- ^ Wasson, Scott (24 January 2008). "A look at VIA's next-gen Isaiah x86 CPU architecture". The Tech Report. Retrieved 24 January 2008.
- ^ "VIA Launches VIA Nano Processor Family" (Press release). VIA. 29 May 2008. Retrieved 29 May 2008.
- ^ "VIA Isaiah Architecture Introduction" (PDF). VIA. 23 January 2008. Retrieved 28 May 2008.
- ^ Bennett, Kyle (29 July 2008). "Intel Atom vs. VIA Nano". [H]ard|OCP.
- ^ Chiappetta, Marco (29 July 2008). "VIA Nano L2100 vs. Intel Atom 230: Head to Head". HotHardware.
- ^ Shrout, Ryan (29 July 2008). "VIA Nano and Intel Atom Review – Battle of the Tiny CPUs". PC Perspective.
- ^ Hruska, Joel (29 July 2008). "Low-end grudge match: Nano vs. Atom". Ars Technica.
- ^ "VIA Introduces New VIA Nano 3000 Series Processors" (Press release). VIA. 3 November 2009.
- ^ "VIA Nano Processor". VIA.
- ^ "VIA Nano x2 Processor SPECfp2000 Benchmarks". VIA.
External links
Press
- "The Battle of Low-Power Processors: Best Choice for a Nettop". 2008-09-27.
- "Low-end grudge match: Nano vs. Atom". 2008-07-30.
- "Via's Nano L2100 takes on Intel's Atom 230". 2008-07-30.