User talk:180.183.136.237

September 2012

Hello, I'm Jschnur. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mohammed Farah, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammed Farah with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Vic, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Queen Vic was changed by 180.183.136.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904257 on 2012-09-15T06:54:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Queen Vic. Jschnur (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Talk:Dani King"

A page you created, Talk:Dani King, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Vic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. доктор прагматик 06:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock appeal

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

180.183.136.237 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone.

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}