Jump to content

User talk:180.183.136.237: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Nonsense
Line 27: Line 27:
== Unblock appeal ==
== Unblock appeal ==


{{unblock|Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone.}}
{{unblock reviewed | 1=Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone. | decline=You have been vandalising, and you know it. Talk page access will be removed to prevent further waste of time with frivolous unblock requests. [[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]] ([[User talk:JamesBWatson|talk]]) 20:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)}}

Revision as of 20:14, 15 September 2012

September 2012

Hello, I'm Jschnur. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Mohammed Farah, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 06:49, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mohammed Farah with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 06:50, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Vic, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Queen Vic was changed by 180.183.136.237 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904257 on 2012-09-15T06:54:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 06:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Queen Vic. Jschnur (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of "Talk:Dani King"

A page you created, Talk:Dani King, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is nonsense or gibberish.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jschnur (talk) 06:58, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2012

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Queen Vic. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. доктор прагматик 06:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. A. B. (talkcontribs) 08:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Unblock appeal

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

180.183.136.237 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Totally different editing habit, and the ISP of 124.122.104.208 is True Corporation, while my ISP is 3BB Broadband. And for the attacking part, I never seriously swearing to anyone.

Decline reason:

You have been vandalising, and you know it. Talk page access will be removed to prevent further waste of time with frivolous unblock requests. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.